Battling Op-Eds
The battle over Eliot Spitzer's executive order to give New York State ID cards to applicants without a social security number is escalating across the Op-Ed pages of the state.
Ruben Diaz, the Democratic state senator and Pentecostal minister from the Bronx, calls it the "worst display of racism" he's seen since his days as a young soldier in South Carolina in 1960.[...]
At least three of those who spoke at the Senate hearing are connected with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which has been spearheading legislation against legal and illegal immigration.
FAIR's founder and longtime leader John Tanton is perhaps the biggest nativist in the U.S. today and an open proponent of population control.
In the 1980s and 1990s, Tanton's FAIR received more than $1million in funding from the Pioneer Fund, an organization dedicated to promoting eugenics and "race betterment." The Pioneer Fund's leaders have even advocated sterilization of the "feeble-minded."
Tom Tancredo, the Republican congressman from Colorado who is running for President, testified against the Spitzer license policy at an Oct. 3 Republican Assembly hearing in Albany.
Tancredo told the Denver Post in July 2005 that immigrants "are coming here to kill you, and you, and me and my grandchildren."
He has also said: "There are places right now in East L.A. and southern Texas ... there is absolutely nothing you would say that makes them part of the United States of America."
These are the kind of people that Republicans in Albany called in as "experts" to testify about Spitzer's license policy.
The governor's hell-bent pursuit of an unneeded rule change that would allow illegal immigrants to get New York state driver's licenses is bad public policy and worse politics, and the intensity of the argument over his unprompted decision it is not diminishing.
The horrendous political implications are obvious when nearly three-quarters of the electorate are against it, and emotionally so.
No matter how the issue turns out in the short run, Spitzer will rue the day he threw this piece of raw meat into the arena.
Probably the savvy lawyers in Spitzer's camp can find a way to ram this rule change through, regardless of opposition legislation from the Senate and growing public hubbub. But this arrogant imposition against the will of the people will continue to fester and have a long life, right to the next election.
Nice. Now that words like racist and arrogant are being thrown around, and that we've established that immigrants are here to kill us or, alternatively, that we're back to Jim Crow - somewhat rich coming from Ruben Diaz - I'm sure we'll see an amicable resolution soon that works in the best interests of the state. Watch those upcoming local elections, folks; there may be a surprise or two in store for all of us.
ID Card Proposal | Eliot Spitzer














Drivergate
Governor Eliot Spitzer is coming across as a most unreasonable man, a character trait most recently on display in what columnist Fred LeBrun of the Albany Times Union calls "Drivergate".
Well, the governor is in good company.
Those who knew the late and extraordinarily effective Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller well use that very word -- unreasonable -- to describe his personality and his approach to pursuing an agenda he deemed in the public interest. His enduring record of achievement speaks for itself and what it says is not an apology. While he never styled himself a "steamroller", Rocky is memorably the only Vice President in the history of the United States who was photographed "flipping the bird" at his critics.
With the "Drivergate†controversy, Governor Spitzer is learning something about Albany that I learned back in the Cuomo administration.
Dealing with the crowd of politicians and bureaucrats in this town -- the people who who have earned Albany its infamous reputation as the most dysfuntional state government in the nation -- is like going up to Saratoga for a day at the races with a group of acquaintances.
We all go out to the stables to look over the horses. I point one out and say: “That’s a winner. Let’s bet on it.“ My companions all disagree and en masse put their money on another horse.
The race is run. My horse comes in first. Theirs comes in second or third or wherever. But it does, at lleast, reach the finish line.
Over the course of the afternoon, we repeat this process several times. Each time, I pick a winner and they all bet on a loser.
Finally, in exasperation, I say, while displaying my fistfull of dollars: “As you can see, I consistently pick winners. Why won’t you bet on my picks and win some money?â€
“Because you’re not a team player. And you’re a threat.â€
The anti-Spitzer vitriol that is spewing and gushing so copiously here in Albany certainly indicates that our governor is a threat. A threat to that infamously dysfunctional status quo in state government with which all the other bettors are quite comfortable.
Drivergate? Well, the fact is that New York has a huge population of illegal immigrants that raises significant public security issues ranging from traffic safety to organized crime and terrorism. The governor is responsible for these problems. He is taking a very minor but sensible administrative step to address at least one of them. If nothing else, he has brought huge attention -- even that of Michael Chertoff -- to this problem. There may be those — even a majority — who think he’s on the wrong track, but he’s riding a winning horse. And what would those critics say if something terrible happened and the governor had not taken at least the action he has proposed?
Personally, as a long-time student of public security policy, I’m more concerned about the percentage of our illegal immigrant population that is involved in organized crime, trafficking in drugs and other contraband, including human beings, and violent gang activity. And let’s not forget all of the law-abiding among the people in that shadowy world of illegal status who are victimized and exploited by those who are also here illegally and up to no good.
Permit me to toss out this idea: Let's consider, while we are awaiting federal action on immigration policy and for the bugs to be worked out of DMV’s document authentication technology, that when these people come in to apply for a driver’s license, we take their fingerprints and add them to the database at the Division of Criminal Justice Services for the standard fee, of course. At least then, we can track them down if they commit a crime.
Now that’s my pick for a winning horse.