Search
Walmart is trying to invade NYC again
Walmart has made several attempts to invade NYC. Each and every time, whether they were aiming to screw Brooklyn, Queens or Staten Island, New Yorkers fought back and kept them out.
Well, they're at it again, even starting a website to try and head off opposition. Bloomerg and the right wing New York Post have been pushing for Walmart to open up in NYC even though Walmart has been shown to deliberately destroy small businesses, use illegal immigrant labor paying them slave wages, and treating their workers badly.
I don't mind big chain stores. I like IKEA and CostCo and Trader Joe's in particular. But Wal-Mart has been shown to be bad for communities they open up in. Walmart will be BAD FOR NYC too. Destruction of small businesses, replacing them with low-paid jobs that Walmart often fills with illegal labor to cut costs...AND sucks at taxpayer money to do it. They KILL jobs in the long run.
Learn about Wal-Mart’s Dismal Record on Worker and Customer Safety (PDF)
Wal-Mart's Wage and Hour Violations (PDF)
Let me also remind my readers about the sexual discrimination lawsuit against Walmart...which they have lost but are appealing on the flimsiest of grounds. From the National Organization of Women:
On Dec. 6, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear retail giant Wal-Mart's challenge to a class-action lawsuit against the company involving more than 1.5 million women. Wal-Mart did not ask the high court to review the actual charges that the company routinely discriminated against its women employees. Instead, the challenge seeks to halt the largest-ever discrimination case in the country before it even gets to trial.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld certification of the class-action suit three times, most recently in April 2010. But Wal-Mart argues that each employee should be forced to file their complaints on an individual basis because a suit this size is too unwieldy and potentially costly.
"First we have banks that are 'too big to fail' -- now Wal-Mart's lawyers are claiming that the company is too big to sue!" exclaims NOW President Terry O'Neill. "Well, guess what? When you're the biggest employer in the nation and the richest company in the world, and you get that way by paying unfair wages, you should expect to find yourself on the wrong end of a massive lawsuit one day. It comes with the territory, so Wal-Mart should stop trying to con its way out of court."
NOW has a history of taking on Wal-Mart. In 2002, the organization named Wal-Mart a "Merchant of Shame" for its notorious employment practices and workplace environment. Chapter activists held educational pickets outside Wal-Mart stores nationwide, handing out fliers explaining the facts about Wal-Mart's discriminatory ways.
Those shameful facts include: women earning nearly a quarter less, on average, than men, despite greater average seniority and higher performance ratings; women concentrated in lower-paying hourly jobs and being paid less even when they held the same jobs as men; women receiving raises at a slower rate than men, thus expanding the pay gap; women waiting longer for promotions and serving in management in proportions dramatically lower than the retailer's competitors.
In addition, Wal-Mart was criticized for excluding contraceptive coverage in insurance plans, violating child labor laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. Cases have also been filed regarding firing pro-union workers, eliminating jobs once workers joined unions, and discouraging workers from unionizing.
"For years, the Wal-Mart empire has been built upon miserly wages that consistently were even more pitiful for women," says O'Neill. "The Wal-Mart executives who have profited from these practices should have the guts to face in court the women they cheated. I hope the Supreme Court will set aside its usual pro-business stance to grant these women the day in court they so richly deserve."
The court will hear the Wal-Mart v. Dukes case in the spring, with a decision to be announced by the end of June 2011.
HELP STOP WAL-MART AND BLOOMBERG FROM RUINING NYCCheck out these websites to find out how you can fight back:
Wal-Mart Free NYC
Neighborhood Retail Alliance
Go here to find out more. Bloomberg is a lost cause, but write NYC Public Advocate Bill de Blasio and Comptroller John Liu and tell them to stop Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart and Bloomberg are anti-union, anti-small business and anti-community. Let's get our Public Advocate and Comptroller fighting for us!
BACK TO PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT NEWSLETTER MAIN PAGE




Re: Walmart is trying to invade NYC again
The store they're looking to open would be on Staten Island and they're polling residents of SI on this. This would be their opening to stores in other boroughs since I doubt very many people from other boroughs would spend $13.00 ($9.50 with EZee Pass) to go to SI to shop at Walmart. Even so, the poll was on the SILIVE Web Site and may still be there so you can vote on that web site (SILive usually keeps stories like this open for about 2 days or so).
Add On - Walmart Also Considering A Site In Brooklyn
This is in addition to my previous comment.
The Bay News came out today. This weekly has a front page story that Walmart is also considering a site in Brooklyn right off the Belt Parkway, near ToysRUs and Kings Plaza. Originally they were looking at a land fill near Target and opposite Starret City but I have a feeling that Target and the other stores in that strip mall nixed it with Markowitz since a Walmart directly opposite Target, Bed/Bath/Beyond, Staples, Old Navy, BJ's, Best Buy, etc would directly cut into their sales. It would be interesting to find out if Manhattan, Bronx and Queens have seen the same stories in their local papers.
More info
Glad to see you're on this. The war has just escalated:
Wal-Mart has begun a propaganda advertising campaign urging new Yorkers to demand of the City Council that Wal-Mart be allowed to open in NYC. They are presenting it as the people of the city being denied an opportunity to save money. Of course no mention of the devastation wreaked on the local business community or the wage base.
I heard an ad this morning on WCBS 880AM (news radio). I hope you can cover this in more detail, as well as cross-post to DK; even though it's a local issue, people there are very aware of Wal-Mart's tactics as a national issue. I think you'd find a receptive audience.
Last bit: beside contacting the Comptroller and the Public Advocate, everyone should write their City Councilmember and the Council President, Christine Quinn. The Council will be holding extensive hearings on the advisability of allowing Wal-Mart to open in NYC, and we need to make sure they know how their constituents feel about it.
My letter:
Dear Councilman Lander/Speaker Quinn:
Please oppose any effort by Wal-Mart to open in New York City. We know the Mayor would like this to happen, and Wal-Mart has already begun a radio ad campaign attempting to enlist the citizens of NYC on their behalf. The Mayor is powerful, and Wal-Mart has almost unlimited financial resources with which to press their case. As a counterweight, the citizens need to hear as loudly and as often as possible about Wal-Mart's well-documented history of destroying local businesses, abusive labor practices, and importation of cheap and sometimes dangerous imported goods, which contributes to the erosion of domestic manufacturing industries.
Re: More info
I heard one of those ads on NPR yesterday. Disgusting and annoying ad. Very typical right wing style self-righteousness mixed with disinformation.