Just as dispiriting, party regulars chose as the convicted Norman's successor Assemblyman Vito Lopez, an old-time ward heeler from Bushwick who has never shown a zeal for reform until, gee whiz, now. He vows the party will consult a panel of learned men and women, such as Brooklyn Law School's dean, about picking quality judges.
We've seen this movie before, and the ending stinks. Two years ago, Norman and party district leaders, Lopez included, pledged they would never support a candidate for a judgeship who had not been approved by an independent screening commission. This year, for the first time, the panel reviewed Civil Court candidates.
And guess what? The party shoehorned two lawyers onto the bench without any screening. Kenny Sherman, son of district leader Roberta Sherman, will get a 10-year Civil Court term without so much as a primary. And Canarsie Assemblyman Frank Seddio was awarded an uncontested ballot line for Surrogate's Court. So much for quality control. So much for keeping your word.
A terrific candidate
Well, if you note the fact that "terrific" comes from the root "terror" and means (according to my dictionary) "causing terror," then perhaps McMahon is a terrific candidate after all.
Since I'm guessing you didn't know that, and didn't mean that McMahon causes terror (and don't know the real difference between "terrific," "fantastic," "awesome," and "great"), I'm going to challenge you to demonstrate in what way(s) McMahon is such a wondrous (not "wonderful") candidate that his opponent's staffers should desire to quit their jobs.