Sorting out the "truth" may seem a treacherous endeavor in such a politically polarized time. But we believe our journalists can play a greater role as an honest broker for voters bewildered by the barrage of campaign talk.
So in a move rare for a news organization, we're dedicating a team of reporters and researchers to meticulously examine the rhetoric of candidates and their partisans, and then make a call: Is the claim true or not?
You might think such work would be standard journalistic fare. But many news organizations can spend less money and get less grief if their political reporting sticks to stenography and puffery.
It's easier to record the words and claims of competing candidates than to vet their accuracy. It's easier to write about the strategy of using negative advertising than to do the painstaking research to sort out whether the claim is actually true or false.
— Neil Brown, Executive Editor of the St. Petersburg Times, announcing Politifact, a new project to determine whether candidate statements are actually true.
Party Affiliation
Party Affiliation is a choice. Right now the Republican Party is dominated by a certain extremist ideology. Those who identify themselves as Republicans have to be prepared to address that. Many, like Pete McClosky and Jim Jeffords ultimately chose to leave the party in disgust.
I looked at John's website. It was clear he probably wasn't in full agreement with Bush/Cheney/McCain, but I think if he wants to distance himself from that ideology he had better be very, very explicit about it. Like a banner headline on his website denouncing Bush and McCain. That would help. But quietly distancing himself and assuming we all will get what he means when he says "Republican" won't cut it. He chooses to affiliate himself with the party of Bush, McCain, Gingrich, DeLay, Hastertt, etc. and that alone is going to alienate a substantial part of the electorate. It is his job to make it clear if he doesn't want that baggage, not ours.