Come on. The question is not about the one year Harrison was working with Republicans in a conservative district while allied with them on a local issue. Similarly, no one here, as you well know, is criticizing McMahon for a stand on the war he took at the early stages. What we want to know, and you should too, is what McMahon said to give the Conservative Party the impression that he might be pro-war enough to earn their support and when he said it. You seem very eager to dismiss what seems to be a pro-war stand that was considered appropos enough for the Conservative Party to consider endorsing him NOW. In the end it may turn out that McMahon hasn't been pro-war in recent years at all. But you don't know that. Neither do we. We are asking for more information and that alone seems to bother you. I would also like clarification on where he stands on permanent bases in Iraq and what he means by redeployment.

Your obsession with opposing anything progressives do becomes almost irrational at times. You are lucky that DFNYC and CBID didn't endorse Marty Connor. I suspect that if they had you would suddenly switch to Squadron in your fear of anything progressives support.