DOMA

What's wrong with DOMA

The so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" (PL 104-199), began life as H.R.3396, and was introduced by Bob Barr, R-GA, who turned out to have most likely cheated on his second wife with the woman who would become his third wife (yeah, he knows something about marriage all right).

It has three sections.

Section one is the title of the act, which is generally shortened to its acronym, DOMA (I can't call it by its full, official name).

Section two relieves states, territories and possessions of the U.S. (and "Indian tribes") from having to accept same-sex marriages performed in other states. It doesn't outright prohibit states from accepting them, merely lets them refuse to do so. This is in direct conflict with Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which begins: "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State."

In other words, section two of DOMA seeks to let states not give "Full Faith and Credit" to same-sex marriages performed in other states; it is clearly unconstitutional.  read more »

Dan Jacoby's picture



Syndicate content

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

User login