Are Black Cops Cut From The Same Cloth As Gay Republicans?

As naive as it may seem, I still tend to assume that "the system" works more than it does not. So, as naive as it may seem, I was recently shaken by the words of several well-respected Black leaders and activists who condemned the New York City Police Department as being pretty much rotten to the core.
As a gay man who was damaged and corrupted by 40 years in the closet, I have no difficulty understanding the symptoms and manifestations of self-hatred, not to mention the pathetic and often-times frightening maneuvers used by self-haters to gain acceptance and invisibility among the so-called majority.
Police Commissioner Ray Kelly has challenged allegations of racism in the horrific Sean Bell shooting. Perhaps his most intriguing response has been to explain that the majority of police officers involved in the incident were in fact Black themselves. Kelly implies that it is illogical to accuse the NYPD of racism under such circumstances.
Some Black leaders have bitterly refuted this defense pointing out that the vast majority of "victims" of police shootings in this city are young African-American men. They contend that once an African-American puts on the NYPD uniform he ceases to be Black and in fact becomes Blue.
Is the NYPD so profoundly corrupt that it teaches racism to its uniforms? Are our cops, regardless of race, trained to make automatic assumptions about men on the street based on the color of their skin? Is racism in this most liberal and progressive of cities in fact pervasively institutionalized? Do Black men and women enter the force to change the system from within only to end up facilitating and enabling an even worse brand of racism?
If the criminal justice system is seriously biased against minorities and particularly against African-Americans, is it even possible for Black police officers to remain true to their own communities and heritage and stand with pride as part of the very organization that represents the enforcement arm of an allegedly racist system of justice?
Are Black officers a defense against racism in our criminal justice system or are they enablers of racism?
These are troubling questions that are now raised by the Bell shooting, and they are questions that have struck an uncomfortably familiar chord within my gay heart.
As a gay New Yorker, I find myself deeply troubled by the possible analogy between Black cops and Gay Republicans. In fact, are Black cops cut from the same cloth as gay Republicans?
Gay Republicans take the position that they can change the system by working from within. The majority of gay men and women, myself included, see Gay Republicans as Uncle Toms who enable homophobia, wallow in self-hatred and sell their souls to gain acceptance by the so-called majority, a majority that openly crusades to deny us, as Gay Americans, our civil rights and our equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I've never before considered the New York City Police Department in this way. Have I been wrong? Are the Abner Louima, Amadou Diallo and Patrick Dorismond incidents of the Giuliani days the rule rather than the exception? Are there no white or black cops, but only racist blue cops in this city?
It may be that a few hearings and debates will produce little more than window dressing. Do we need a revolution at the center? Perhaps Christine Quinn's gay perspective may be of some real use in this situation as she looks within the system, the police department and the heart of Ray Kelly.
Activism | Black | Crime | GLBT / Gay, Lesbian, BiSexual, Transgender | Law Enforcement | Police Department, NYPD | Christine Quinn | Raymond Kelly
If either of you gentlemen
could explain the existence of Log Cabin Republicans to me I'd be deeply grateful.
Being Jewish and female, I am not a total stranger to the concept of self-hatred, but it boggles the mind...."Jews for Hitler", indeed.
It's heartbreaking to consider what the name of "100 Blacks..." implies. In fact, I have a vestigial, and quite possibly mistaken, memory that the group's original name didn't include "Who Care". If I'm wrong, please let me know. If I'm right, the implications are even worse.
The LCRs
...freak me out. I've had the most horrible arguments with friends about this, and overall, we agree to not even talk about it.
There's no single explanation of, say, someone like this.
But it does seem to me that the HomoCons tend to be a variant of a more generic narcissism that afflicts many of us, except it's turned inwards at the community. And there are some religious freaks, of course, who ignore all the parts in religion they don't like and somehow construct an identity that manages to be 'gay, but'.
Think Alan Keyes.

Someone like this...
...might just happen to be convinced, in the same way you are convinced about liberal ideas (i.e., certain arguments appeal to your intellect and accord with your values) that conservative ideas are best at delivering the most compassionate policy outcomes.
Unless you can demonstrate that homosexuals are genetically pre-disposed to prefer social democratic ideology or policy and then prove that this hypothetical predisposition is predictive of political outlook and then voting behaviour, it is silly to pretend you are so shocked that LCRs and homocons might actually exist.
We are all human. When we stop talking to each other we fail at politics. If anyone has any questions about my position or the ideas I defend send me an email.
This homocon, at least, is more likely to get drunk with a liberal and pronounce 'homocon' with a funny Aussie accent than insist on silence during an otherwise energetic debate.
Heh.
As long as 'conservatism' favors the established order of things, which established order wants to see gays as gays kept silent and away from power, 'conservatism' is deeply alien to us on a fundamental, systemic level. That doesn't mean, obviously, that some members of the tribe won't integrate closely enough with the male-dominated power structure to support it. I believe the expression is 'passing'.
And sorry, that's not good enough. I expect to participate in all this on my own terms, and I do.
As to compassionate social outcomes, judging by a misunderstood metric known as 'the world we live in', it does appear that policies engendered with a view to community, versus Darwinian all-eat-all, is preferable.
But welcome, and we hope to see you again soon. Let the dialogue commence.














Eric Adams...
...the freshly elected state Senator, actually founded a group called '100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care'. Having tp point out that they care certainly indicates that this is not the norm, as it were.
As to gay republicans, honestly, and to use a broad brush, most of them are deeply damaged individuals who see themselves, in some measure and wrongly, as iconoclasts. The internalized homophobia there seems to manifest itself as 'Yeah, I'm gay, but that's not all there is to me' or some such drivel. The implication is that if you're a gay Democrat, you're just 'going with the crowd' or something like that. Deeply and endlessly infuriating, that, with more than a whiff of 'Jews for Hitler'.