Search
What Message is NYC Giving our Politicians? An analysis of yesterday's election
I posted a version of this on Daily Kos and people did not like it. They did not like my message that the left is failing (as things are now) and one person even called me a troll. (We made up later, though) This is a depressed and angry analysis of what happened yesterday and my intention is not just to rant...but to basically say that the left is not succeeding in reaching America...or even NYC.
I am becoming convinced that Hillary Clinton really is delivering what voters are indicating they want. I am becoming convinced that the left doesn't have a clue about what America is all about...or, more accurately, what the American people are all about.
I am becoming convinced that America WANTS Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Joe Lieberman...they WANT either Lite Republicans or Republican Lite. You and I are either wrong or we are doing a really lousy job of getting the word out. All of this is coming to me thanks to yesterday's really abysmally boring NYC primary election.
Years ago, before Bill Clinton's presidency, I think, a Pulitzer Prize winning (and recently deceased) journalist, David Shaw of the L.A. Times, wrote a piece he called "The Greying of American Politics." He was not referring to AARP's power. He was referring to a phenomenon whereby in the national arena (specifically Presidential politics) no candidate with any unusual ideas, characteristics or positions would make it through the grueling process of a national election. Since America is so big and diverse in ideas, only the most boring candidates can survive the process. No exciting bright colors...only boring, grey politics as usual. Americans like non-threatening candidates who make them feel like everything is okay...fine...go back to watching TV.
David Shaw was talking about presidential politics, but I am convinced that this phenomenon is starting to apply at all levels of politics, including Brooklyn, NY.
People on the left love to hate Hillary Clinton. Many say "Hillary does not represent me..." or "Hillary is not a true Democrat." Usually I defend her based on her overall voting record, but truth be told, despite my frequent defense of people like Clinton and Biden, they don't represent me either. At least not to my satisfaction. But let us look at the message that voters send them. Look at the Democratic primary in NYC (the most liberal part of NY State)...and look at the mayoral polls.
Yesterday NYC chose a boring, pro-business, do-nothing incumbent Public Advocate over a dynamic, strongly pro-Civil Liberties challenger. The incumbent won handily. The Democrats of the liberal city of NYC spoke loud and clear that they wanted calm, boring, non-threatening politics as usual. So they re-elected Betsy Gotbaum, the Public Advocate that disappeared from public view after her election. They chose the candidate that Mayor Bloomberg supported. They chose the candidate that has never stood up for the public. And they solidly rejected the progressive, interesting candidate, Norm Siegel, who had been head of the NY Civil Liberties Union for 15 years.
The clear message from yesterday is that NYC wants boring politicians who don't stand up for anything.
In the Brooklyn DA's race it was even worse. The most solidly progressive, most honest and most pro-Civil Liberties candidate, Paul Wooten, never even made it to the distant second that Norm Siegel did in the Public Advocates race. Paul Wooten dropped out, claiming lack of support. The second most progressive candidate, Arnie Kriss, came in dead last yesterday. The THIRD most progressive candidate, Mark Peters who tried to buy the race with his family's money, came in distant third. The person who won was a thuggish, corrupt incumbent who looks like he is from a mafia flick and who says all is well and we need to stay the course. The person who came in second was the even more corrupt, equally thuggish machine candidate. The progressives barely made an imact on the race even though they had two, maybe three, good candidates.
Again, NYC wants business as usual--either the incumbent or the machine. We accept corruption as long as nothing too radical disturbs our quiet existence.
Finally let's look at the polls for mayor. The Republican mayor Bloomberg looks way ahead in the polls. NYC voters seem to want a boring, pro-business Republican running the show.
This is the message voters are sending politicians--be boring. Be pro-business. Don't rock the boat. Don't disturb our TV viewing time. Be Lite.
WHY SHOULD HILLARY CLINTON OR JOE BIDEN DO ANYTHING ELSE BUT BE BORING AND PRO-BUSINESS? Hillary Clinton has to play to NYC and to upstate. NYC is the more liberal part of that equation. And we vote for Mayor Bloomberg, Betsy Gotbaum and Joe Hynes...We vote for incumbents. We vote for pro-business. We vote "stay the course." We are telling Hillary Clinton that she should by no means be more liberal than mayor Bloomberg, no more exciting than Betsy "do nothing" Gotbaum, no more progressive than Joe Hynes.
Hillary Clinton does what the voters say she should do. She represents those who elected her...and Bloomberg...and Hynes...and Gotbaum. She doesn't represent you and me because you and I barely show up as tiny blips in an election. You and I and all our progressive ilk are nothing in American politics. That is the lesson I learned yesterday in NYC.
Why is it this way? Do most Americans REALLY want it this way? Do we here at dKos REALLY represent only a tiny minority of voters even in NYC? Or are we, the left, so divided, so ineffective and so lazy that the good candidates don't go anywhere because we don't get out there and fight for them?
I don't know. I do know that until we prove ourselves to be effective and active within the Democratic Party, there is no reason for any politician to buck the boring, pro-business trend. Because boring and pro-business wins the day, even in NYC.
I have no solution. I have tried throwing myself into the depths of local politics and organize and inspire my fellow progressives and get them busy. Nothing... No effect on yesterday's election. Zero.
The left made something of a splash in OH-2. We still lost, but we made a splash. But here's the thing. We didn't make a splash in NYC yesterday. We were nothing. If all we can do is an occasional, single district near miss like OH-2, we really won't be cutting it. If that is all we can manage (and maybe it really is all we can manage!) then you and I won't even be a footnote in history.
Folks, prove me wrong here. But I think Bush America at worst, or, at best, Biden America is here to stay and you and I here on dKos, dGotham, My Left Wing, etc. are nothing but a lonely, ignored minority.




"WHY SHOULD HILLARY CLINTON O
"WHY SHOULD HILLARY CLINTON OR JOE BIDEN DO ANYTHING ELSE BUT BE BORING AND PRO-BUSINESS?"
Best point I've read yet. It is funny though...or telling really, those who are left I speak to, who plan to vote for Bloomberg. are happy, yes prefectly satisfied, with the job Hillary is doing. I think Hillary is doing an ok job, but I am not satisfied. They are.
http://onNYTurf.com
As usual you are dead on
I just deleted an incredibly stupid diary over at DailyKos because I am frustrated and agitated over exactly what you wrote. I feel that people are not paying attention, they don't care and we're left here stranded like the lunatic in the corner screaming the truth. Just that nobody pays attention.
I am happy that Wiener was such a big man. I am desolate about how a lot of their supporters say they'd rather vote for Bloomberg than vote for Ferrer.
It's just incredible. That is like voting for Bush.
NYC
IT is easy for people to assume NY State and NYC are solid blue. You and I know they are not. And we know that the blue we get isn't always a clean blue. The Brooklyn Dem party includes some pretty sleazy scum. We need help in NYC, but it is hard for a nationally focused group to see that.
But the problem is worse, I think. The blogsphere, for better or, I think, for worse has become a forum for nothing more than rehashing internal fights--Dean vs. Kerry vs. Clinton vs. Kucinich vs. Nader vs...
People want to be RIGHT...not winners. So they remain losers.
2005 and 2006 elections need CRITICAL attention, but most bloggers are still rehashing 2000 and 2004. This is typical of leftists. Gotta love 'em because they mean well. But they are LOSERS. You and I are trying to herd cats and turn leftist Americans into a united front that can win elections. Just call us Don Quixote and dismiss us as dreamers!
But if we don't succeed, the party will be lost, the nation will be lost, the world will be lost. As a Jew who knows my history, I also realize my life might be on the line if the radical Christianization of the US continues much longer. We are fighting for our lives, for the souls of Americans, for our future. Most leftists are fighting about whether Dean, Kucinich or Nader are "purer" and who can denegrate Clinton (either one!), Kerry and Gore more.
Daily Gotham so far isn't arousing NYC leftists. But I am coming to realize even Dean's DFNYC and NDM aren't succeeding. WFP is drifting the way of IND. And all the alphabet soup of NYC politics are drifting to uselessness.
I have two IND friends. One is an example of what is wrong with reform Brooklyn politics (endorsing Hynes and Gotbaum????) and one is an example of what is right with reform Brooklyn politics (favoring folk like Siegel, Wooten and Chris Owens). We need to be part of those groups so we can help the latter against the former. We have to run for county committee, be active members of Dem clubs as well as DFNYC and/or NDM.
But you know this better than I do. How do we get the rest of the city, the rest of the nation ACTIVATED??? I don't know. I am losing faith and will soon be losing time to devote to this. Family and a new job demand attention. If I feel alone in the wilderness, it is hard to justify taking the time to devote to politics when science and family demand attention as well.
Thanks for what you do. Let's do our best to keep it up.