Voting Machines Come to NY State: we need to protect our right to clean elections

Democracy for NYC has an action alert that is really critical for all New Yorkers. Our voting rights are up for sale and several companies are bidding to provide the machines that we will vote on. This is not a partisan issue. This is an issue of what machines are reliabe, verifiable and cost-effective. Some vendors are pushing heavily for expensive and unrelaibe machines with no voter-verifiable paper trail. We have to be certain that there is a paper trail because without one our elections will never be verifiable. Whether or not you believe election fraud has played a role in American politics, I am sure we ALL want to make sure that fraud is detectable if it does happen. Hence the need for a paper trail that a voter can check. Right now we have to push our election officials to reject machines that are more expensive and less reliable and urge them to favor machines that are verifiable. Currently these officials mainly hear from the vendors who are trying to sell their machines. We need to be the voice of the people standing up for fair elections.

From the DFNYC website:

Draft voting machine regulations reflecting changes in State law to comply with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), were recently posted on the Board of Election's web site. These regulations will dictate the certification of voting systems for purchase in New York state. The Board will hold three public hearings on this issue including one in NYC on December 20...

"PB/OS" (paper ballots with precinct-based optical scanners) is the safest, most reliable and most cost-effective choice for a voting system in NY State. And yet, the state Board of Elections has recently taken two outrageous steps against this system...

(1) Allowing the vendors NOT to submit optical scanners, effectively taking away the PB/OS option

First, representatives of the Board recently claimed they cannot force the voting machines vendors to provide the PB/OS option to the counties of NY (by having vendors submit optical scanners for certification.) This is an outrageous position, given that so many citizens, civic groups, and newspapers all over NY State are calling for the PB/OS system, rather than the expensive, insecure, error prone DREs that the vendors would prefer to sell us.

In a huge state such as New York, it is absurd for the Board of Elections to claim that they have no power to require vendors to submit optical scanning machines. New York is simply far too large of a market for the vendors to ignore. Voting machine vendors will provide anything that New York State requires of them. (As explained by New Yorkers for Verified Voting, NYVV.org)

(2) Jumpstarting certification testing on an incomplete DRE machine (no paper ballot)

Secondly, the Board of Elections has also made the outrageous decision to begin preliminary certification testing of the Liberty DRE computerized voting machine. Testing voting machines for certification was not to begin until after the issuing of draft regulations and a comment period. And most importantly, the Liberty DRE machine still has no voter verified paper ballot or full accessibility features as required by law. Doing certification testing on this machine is completely pointless. Testing an incomplete system is dangerous and bodes poorly for the need for a robust, thorough and transparent set of machine certification tests. (Also from NYVV.org)

TAKE ACTION TODAY!

Mail or fax a letter to the State Board of Elections demanding that they (1) require vendors to submit NYS full face ballot compatible optical scanners for certification and (2) stop planned testing of the incomplete and illegal Liberty DRE machine. Remind the Board that they work for us, not the voting machine vendors.

Don't let the voting machine vendors decide what machines we vote on. Please write the State Board of Elections today.

By mail: NYS Board of Elections, 40 Steuben Street, Albany, NY 12207-2108
By fax: 518-486-4068
By e-mail: ldaghlian -at- elections.state.ny.us (replace -at- with @)

Please address your letter to:

Peter Kosinski, Co-Executive Director
Stanley Zalen, Co-Executive Director
Neil W. Kelleher, Chair
Evelyn J. Aquila, Commissioner
Helena Moses Donohue, Commissioner

I really want to make clear that the eVote DRE machines are a real threat to our democracy. They are unrelaible--can be hacked, do not have a paper ballot and have computer code that is propriatary so we, the voters, are blocked from knowing how the machine functions. In districts where DRE machines have been used hacking has been reported as have numerous computer bugs that changed votes. Not having a paper ballot severely limits the voters' ability to verify that their vote was accurate recorded and makes recounts difficult. Having the machines use code that is not reviewable by the public means we do not know whether the machines are fair and accurate. Furthermore, the DRE machines are far more expensive than the PBOS machines, need to be replaced more often and are more expensive to use. PBOS machines are the ONLY acceptable choice on the market today. DRE machines are not acceptable and that is the message we have to send to our election officials.


mole333's picture

|

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mole333's picture

Sample Letter

Here is a sample letter, also from the DFNYC website.

Sample message: (please change to represent your own words)

To the Commissioners and Co-Executive Directors,

Paper ballots with precinct-based optical scanners, aka "PB/OS" is the safest, most reliable and most cost-effective choice for a voting system in NY State. So I am writing to express my strong disapproval at the two recent steps the Board of Elections has recently taken against the PB/OS option.

First, the Board should require the vendors to submit NYS full face ballot compatible optical scanners for certification. It is absurd to claim you cannot do this. New York is simply far too large of a market for the vendors to ignore. Voting machine vendors will provide anything that New York State requires of them.

Secondly, the Board should not jumpstart certification testing of the Liberty DRE machine. It is pointless and dangerous to begin testing on a voting system that is incomplete. The Liberty machine does not have a voter verified paper ballot or features to make it accessible to disabled voters.

As Commissioners and Co-Executive Directors of the Board of Elections, you are each accountable to the citizens of New York, not the voting machine vendors.

Sincerely,

[Your name]
[Your address]
[Your city & zip]
[Your email address or phone number]


brought to you by


Current weather

NY - New York City, Central Park

night-clear
  • Clear sky
  • Temperature: 78.8 °F
  • Wind: Variable, 6.9 mph
  • Pressure: 29.89 inHg
  • Rel. Humidity: 74%
  • Visibility: 8 miles

Visit Our Sponsors

Premium Advertisers


Upcoming events

Poll

Subscribe to our daily digest

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz


culturekitchen Media

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Random image

What Dan Garodnick is thinking of whenever he sees me

Who's online

There are currently 5 users and 1119 guests online.

Blogroll

Editors and Contributors

Mole's Progressive Democrat
New Democratic Majority
Alien and Sedition
Dan Jacoby

The Indies

Adirondack Musings
The Albany Project
Angry Brown Butch
Atlantic Yards Report
Blue Spot
Buffalo Pundit
Buffalo Geek
Bike Blog
Brooklyn Rail
The Community Alliance
Danger Democrat
DDDB
DragonFlyEye
EverythingNY
Gowanus Lounge
Hell's Kitchen Online
Joshing Politics
Mamita Mala
Mamapalooza blog
More Gardens
Nassau GOP Watch
New York Games
No Land Grab
NY 13
On NY Turf
Peter King Watch
Politics on the Hudson
Open Orleans
Prometheus6
Room Eight
Steve Gilliard RIP
The Oil Drum
Troy Polloi
Rochester Turning
Simply Left Behind
Time's Up
The Working Families Party Man
Power from Truth by Chris Owens

The little big media

Capitol Confidential
Gotham Gazette
Daily Politics
Wonkster
New York Blade
NYC Bloggers
NYC Indymedia
The Politicker
EmpireZone
Power Plays
Spin Cycle

The big little media

Curbed
Gawker
Gothamist
The Politico
City Limits

Everybody Party! blogs

New Democratic Majority
Stonewall Democrats
Working Families Party's WFPBlog

The Brains

The Brennan Center
Reform NY
The Century Foundation
Center for American Progress
Drum Major Institute's DMIblog
edwize
TortDeform

The Movement

New Democratic Majority
Democracy for NYC
DL21C
Act Now
Capitol D Group
New York Democratic Lawyers Council

The Loyal Opposition

Alarming News
News Copy
Ragged Thots
Suitably Flip
Urban Elephants
Serf City

Fun Stuff

City Rag
Jossip
Overheard in New York

This list is a work in progress. Are there blogs you believe should be included (maybe your own)? Please leaves us a message through our contact page. Or drop us a line at :

editors(at)
dailygotham(dot)com


Progressive Districts

Only in New York

Fossella [is] anything but the independent fighter for constituents that he claims to be in this campaign. He has been a real water-carrier for the Bush administration and the Republican leadership, staunchly backing the war in Iraq while at the same time denying health benefits to National Guard and Reserve members who make up much of the American force there.

The congressman...has been unsympathetic to environmental concerns and has opposed a woman’s right to choose. He does his constituents no favors by his support for privatizing Social Security. He has voted to protect gun makers and sellers. While Mr. Fossella has lately sought funding to deal with health problems related to to the attacks of Sept. 11, he has largely been missing on important local issues. His Democratic colleague, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who represents the Sixth District, has often been left to advocate Staten Island’s many transportation needs, including the North Shore rail.

Mr. Fossella has offered only lame excuses for improperly using his campaign funds for skiing holidays in Vail (including lessons and equipment), as well as vacations in Florida — transgressions first reported by the Daily News. He has received donations from a lobbying firm with ties to Jack Abramoff. Earlier this year, he was fined a reported $60,000 for misusing his taxpayer-funded official mailing privileges.

— NY Times Editorial Board in 2006