Search
Vito's Farce: The Decline of Party Boss Vito Lopez?
Bit by bit the power of Party Boss Vito Lopez is slipping. This was evident in this year's Democratic County Committee meeting this last Monday where what seemed to me to be some three, maybe four, groups of insurgents disrupting the scripted farce.
This was our third County Committee meeting. The first was when Joy was already overdue with Jacob. We had kind of hoped she would go into labor right then and there and disrupt the script. That would have been especially satisfying because it would have disrupted former Party Boss Clarence Norman's last hurrah before he went to prison. But Jacob debut came days later, so he didn't manage to upsatge Clarence Norman. That first meeting was also our entry into the insurgency as we saw what a farce it was, nothing more than a rubber stamp to the Party Boss's power with no real democracy as part of the Democratic Party in Brooklyn. The highlight was Ken Diamondstone's efforts to expose the farce for what it was. Diamondstone's efforts were ineffective, but they were both entertaining and illustrative. Sometimes the only way to fight a farce is with farce.
This year was far more exciting. First off, it seems Marty Connor was given HIS last hurrah this year. Connor, a long-time incumbent, was defeated by upstart Daniel Squadron. Remember as you read this that I endorsed Marty Connor against Squadron. Marty Connor was chosen this year to be the emcee of Vito Lopez's farce. Meanwhile, many Squadron supporters were there and quickly joined the insurgency against Vito's Farce. I endorsed Marty Connor for ideological reasons. But if Squadron is going to help bring down Vito Lopez, well, I'm listening. This also makes me wonder if my holding Squadron's connection with sleaze monger Michael Tobman against Squadron was wrong. Tobman seems to be Vito's latest lackey while Squadron's supporters seem to be Vito's latest irritation.
Joy and I were part of the old reform insurgency that has mildly disrupted the Party Script before. Interestingly, it was Charles Barron who began the disruption this year. Now I am no fan of Charles Barron's, but when he gets it right he has quite a knack of saying it just right. I believe "farce," "travesty," and "insult" were among the words he used to describe Vito's Farce. He got some loud applause from people who normally would not side with him.
New Kings Democrats were also there. This was an outgrowth of the Brooklyn Obama campaign, though it seemed to me that they also were something of a force for Squadron at least unofficially. Their goal is to democraticize the process in Brooklyn at least in part by electing people to County Committee. This was their first entry into County Committee and they quickly realized the script didn't include them, that Marty's running of the proceedings was biased towards the Party Boss, and that they had every intention of digging in and fighting the machine.
So at this point Vito had three vocal factions, completely disorganized, of course, but all disrupting Vito's Farce. These included the old reform movement (which is generally ineffective but did help defeat Vito in two Surrogate Court races and the Adler/Cohen Civil Court race), Charles Barron, and an organization inspireed by Obama and Squadron. Disorganized, but with considerable potential to damage the machine.
The motion that carried from insurgents and seemed most distressing to the machine forces was one that called for five more seats on the executive board of the County Committee. The proceedings were fairly chaotic at that point, so I am not sure who proposed this, but it seemed to come from yet a fourth insurgent group. [NOTE: See comments for a more accurate interpretation of this...I missed key details and misinterpreted. Others point out it was a power play by Vito Lopez.] I am sure someone will fill us in on who this came from and why, but the bottom line is so many people were pissed at that point, that the motion carried despite Marty Connor and Vito Lopez's interest in killing it [NOTE: Again...see the comments. I am probably wrong in my interpretation].
There also seemed a clear dispute over who would represent some EDs in another Assembly district and I was not clear on who was opposing the machine slate...but it was also clear that Marty Connor basically allowed the machine slate to push aside the insurgent slate.
Afterwards, Vito Lopez looked grim. Of course he never really looks happy. But I suspect that this was the first time he seriously felt his grip slipping on Brooklyn. And I suspect that Obama and Squadron's ground troops almost certainly were the most frightening to Lopez because they represent emerging forces nationally and statewide. I suspect that the state level party is getting a bit sick of Vito Lopez who, as far as I am aware, never carries out Democratic voter registration, never seriously helps a campaign defeat a Republican (in fact discourages challenges to Republicans) and is constantly dogged by charges of corruption and investigations. And remember that Vito has been losing for some time. Margarita Lopez-Torres won a very close election for Surrogate judge. That was a big loss for Vito since Surrogate Judge was one of Vito's biggest plums to give to supporters. Then he lost the SECOND Surrogate Judge seat to Diane Johnson (ironically his candidate against Margarita Lopez-Torres). This year he lost the 1st Civil Court race where he and Brooklyn's own Karl Rove, Michael Tobman, ran an expensive and nasty smear campaign on behalf of Roger Adler against Devin Cohen...and Cohen won. So Vito's power is shrinking already and now several new groups are joining the fray against him.
More battles are to come. The Vito Lopez/Michael Tobman sleaze team that was behind the failed and expensive Adler run are reportedly eying at least two city council races, including my own district (Yassky's seat). Defeating the sleaze team yet again will be my main goal next year. And I am sure we will have more Vito Lopez backed judicial candidates like the homophobic Noach Dear (who never practiced law in his life yet was muscled in by Vito into a judicial spot with the help of people like Marty Markowitz and Dominic Recchia).
But the real question, and one I am frequently asked by machine supporters, is who will replace Vito Lopez? Of course the best answer would be "no one" because what we need is a real reform of the whole system where party bosses aren't able to lord it over Brooklyn like a personal political fiefdom. But unless voters really get organized and reject the sleazier people like Vito Lopez and Marty Markowitz, reform may just have to start with a future party boss. Can that happen? It wouldn't be unprecedented, but it could happen. I had once thought the reform of Los Angeles politics could be a model for Brooklyn reform, but my friend who specializes in the history of progressive politics in California explained that reform happened in Los Angeles because the developers turned against the machine and favored reform. Hard to imagine THAT happening here in Brooklyn, particularly since some of the biggest backers of the likes of Lopez and Markowitz are developers.
But the election of Daniel Squadron tells us one thing. Incumbents aren't as secure as they once were. Problem is, it takes tons of money to defeat them. I have been saying there is a new force in NYC politics, or maybe not so new so much as maturing: The Schumer Clan. Will it become a Schumer machine? Will it favor reform or merely its own form of machine domination? Squadron isn't the first of the Schumer clan to win office, of course. But he was a major blow to the establishment in NYC. Adler's loss was a more minor blow, but a blow none the less. And that establishment in Brooklyn had already suffered several blows by losing both Surrogate Court seats. And now Charles Barron seems in on the insurgency. Vito Lopez is losing, slowly but surely. The question is, who will win?




Rage Against the Machine
As I wrote in my blog, mole333 and mrs. mole333 both deserve credit too for resisting Monday night's script. I just want to add a few clairifications to mole's appraisal:
1) While it is accurate that the New Kings Democrats grew out of the Obama campaign, NKD is in no way affiliated with Daniel Squadron. Though a number of its members did volunteer and support Squadron, no official or unofficial action was taken by the club on his behalf. Other than a few informal emails, none was even discussed. If Squadron wants to spearhead a reform of the party, great. But the members of New Kings aren't his foot soldiers.
2) The motion calling for an expansion of the executive board was, as far as I could tell, also written in the script. This motion is hardly as reformist or democratic as it might seem, since, once again, it is the Party Chairman who is vested with the power of selecting the County Committee Members who would join the board. In other words, five more people who agree unfailingly with Vito.
3) The issue of the conflicting slates of appointees to the County Committee was originated by New Kings. In every AD where New Kings had five or more elected members, it used the opening in the bylaws to propose more of its own for the committee. The New Kings slate, thus, in most cases, ended up bumping heads with County's slate. The fact that New Kings successfully added more members of its club to the County Committee by appointment is proof that NKD did accomplish something in the meeting, which, as mole points out, is basically impossible with one man and one voice effectively in charge of everything. Until Brooklyn's reformers are able to gain the majority of seats in the County Committee, then the best that we will be able to hope for out of these meetings is for people like Ken Diamondstone and Charles Barron to stand up and call out these farces for what they truly are.
Thanks!
I tried making it clear that NKD was not specifically an Obama or Squadron organization so much as inspired by and overlapping with their supporters. If I didn't make that sufficiently clear, thanks for clarifying.
I stand corrected on the 5 new members. I was distracted as it happened and didn't catch who proposed it but noticed some machine folks looking distinctly displeased. Based on that alone and the fact that it happened in the midst of the insurrection, I assumed it was insurgency based. I also did not notice it being read from th script. One thing that I did wonder about was why Vito Lopez's 700 supposed proxies (which we are never allowed to see and count) didn't come into play to crush it like a bug. Your interpretation is more in line with the lack of proxy power application and I think you caught a more accurate view of what happened. I will put a note in the main text referring to your observations.
As to conflicting slates. I knew the 52nd had some overlap between NKD and people who got on by petition. Was the other conflicting slate, which went to a farce vote and was crushed by the machine, also NKD? That was unclear to me.
All this points to a fundamental issue: all aspects of the reform/insurgency movements are uncoordinated, as is typical of the left. Charles Barron, myself and the Squadron supporters all come from different angles and may not agree on many things. Question is, can we come together to bump Vito Lopez? And the second question is what can/will we replace Vito's machine with?
I blew it.
I actually missed the meeting due to a scheduling mixup (I had the wrong date on my calendar). When I realized my mistake, my first thought was, "After the charade of two years ago, I probably didn't miss much, nor would my presence have mattered".
Now I find out that you started the revolution without me.
Hey!
Is everyone but me on the county committee? Do I need to run for this or something?
No, don't answer that
Join us!
I can just imagine the steam coming from your ears as you watch the farce 2 years from now. Come on...join in the fun ; -)
Answer to question one:
no. I wish that were the case, because then we'd be able to depose Vito.
Answer to question two: yes, but it's pretty easy, especially if you're on good terms with your state assemblyperson. Once you get them to invite you, all you need to do is carry petitions for your local electeds and nominees within your ED (an area of about 2 square blocks). You usually need to collect about 20-40 signatures. It can be done in a couple of hours on a Saturday.
The Way The Meeting Started
I figured we'd be there until 3 AM. Charles Barron (who I really don't like) I have to admit hit the nail on the head with his comments. Anyway, I went to the ladies room, came back, sat down and the meeting was ended. I sat there with my mouth opened unable to believe what had transpired in the scripted meeting that was not meant to really involve County Committee members.
David and Joy, you were the best but NKD need to get their act together and they have 2 years to do it.
Start The Revolution
The key is that all new motions and business has to be put in writing to every county committee member 10 days prior to the meeting (unless bylaws have changed it to 5). Which makes it REALLY DIFFICULT to call for change on the nite of the meeting. It has to be carefully planned out.
The big "reform" was a major disolving of the "leaders vote" on the executive committee so that Vito can have a constant majority, that is what Baron missed entirely (as did most others xcept Robert Newman). Vito now has 5 votes totally within his control giving him a nice cushion of safety.
The KEY here is to get together with Marty Connors (who has the brainpower) and have him on your side for the REVOLT.
However, I fear he has already been bought off with some promise of legal business or consulting work and probably a payroll spot on someones staff.
Just my two cents that seems to be worth only a penny these days.