The Ugliness of Republican Hysteria
Spent way too much of this weekend petitioning in the hot weather to get Joy and me on County Committee and our friend Devin Cohen on the ballot for Civil Court judge. I can't complain too much because Devin is wearing himself out walking districts, petitioning for himself and others, meeting voters and generally doing his part. But even the small part we did with Devin wore me out. But it also gave me yet another personal encounter with Republican ugliness.
In 2006 I encountered a particularly nasty Republican liar in Bay Ridge while I was campaigning for Steve Harrison for Congress and they were campaigning for Vito "Two Families" Fossella. This Republican woman was telling voters that Fossella was an Independent. She got angry with me for correcting her each time by pointing out that he was a Republican that she actually shoved me. Well, lying and violence is Bush Republicanism, so what can we expect from our local Republicans?
Petitioning through Brooklyn this weekend we approached many people asking if they are registered Democrats. Many just say no, wanting to get on with their life. Some say yes and hear us out and either sign our petition or not. Then there was the ugly Republican, a man who illustrated precisely what is most wrong with the Republican Party today. This particular nasty Republican was a gentleman dressed in camouflage-pattered clothes (funny...don't people notice they are in a city so camouflage just looks silly) with a dour look on his face. I was going to give him a miss, but my friend approached him and asked whether he was a registered Democrat.
His response:
"Absolutely not! What do you think is going to happen with a black man running this country. I even hear he may be a Muslim."
Herein is the ugly underbelly of the Republican Party. Many republicans believe that only whites have the right to run the country. He even said something I didn't fully catch about "they've never done anything for us." Well one can come up with thousands of examples of blacks who have done wonders for us, from Crispus Atticus to the many black heroes who gave their lives in military service, just to name one kind of example. How about the Tuskegee Airmen? Dr. Charles Drew may well have saved more lives than 99% of whites. Yet to Republicans none of these people matter because they are black. What do I think is going to happen with Obama running this country? I think we will do far, far better than when either Bush or Reagan or Nixon or Ford did when running the country.
And the Muslim comment is doubly stupid. First, he is not a Muslim. Anyone who believes that is believing a deliberate lie that has been disproven. They are as gullible as can be. But even worse, so what if he WAS a Muslim? I have known dozens of Muslims living in NYC, serving as EMTs, doctors, educators. I know one who rushed down to ground zero in 9/11 (while Bush and Cheney were hiding) to help.
Republicans are terrified. They fear blacks and they fear Muslims. They fear freedom of speech and a fair vote. They fear democracy. Republican fear reaches a kind of hysteria that I personally find pathetic.
The party of Dwight D. Eisenhower paralyzed by hysterical fear. The party of Lincoln displaying unabashed racism. Pathetic. It is no wonder people are leaving the Republican Party in disgust.
Republican Racism
Of course
But it goes much further and is much more ingrained in the modern Republican ideology. From Bill O'Reilly, Steve King, and Pat Robertson to the Delaware Pogrom and Indiana's "2% solution" against Jews, references to blacks as monkeys, the institutional racism involved in leaving poor blacks to drown in New Orleans, and racism in Montana against Indians, right down to Republican hatred of Catholics, Jews, and Muslims, Republican racism may not be unique, but it is particularly nasty, widespread and dangerous.
I have, however, compared and contrasted Republican racism vs. the more subtle Democratic racism in "Angry White Men and Conveniently Compassionate White Men". I also should state that I know many non-racist Republicans, but I have found them almost universally disgusted by their own party since Bush took over, and they aren't too happy about McCain. Democrats reflect the inherant racism in America, and let's face it the nomination of Obama with such high voter turnout shows that Democrats as a group are overcoming that at least to some degree. Republican racism reprepsents the embracing of an extremist right wing fanatical ideology that has split the Republican party. The man I met today embodied the worst kind of American racism.
I've Encounted The Same Situations As You Dan
I live in a fairly conservative but mostly Democratic Area of of Brooklyn and this weekend while petitioning for Steve Harrison I encounted one man who told me they wouldn't vote for HUSSAIN OBAMA and another who used that n word. Both were Republicans. I have also encounted a few Dems who wanted to make sure I wasn't getting signatures for Obama because they had no intention of voting for him (3 were extreme Hillary supporters and hopefully they'll change their mind.
By the way David, I remember that incident last year, right outside a Catholic church. I wonder how those 2 feel about their precious family man Vito now.
Same here
Democratic (or "Democratic") racism has made itself known among my circle of acquaintances since Obama clinched the nomination. In some ways I prefer the Republican variety, which at least is open about what it is. The other kind prefers to masquerade as any other possible objection to the candidate - he's an anti-Semite, he's a communist (!), how could he have attended that church for 20 years?
This is coming from people who've vociferously complained to me about Bush, and in one case from someone who hates HRC, too. She told me she'd rather vote for Clinton, whom she believes to be completely amoral, than Obama.
We've got our work cut out for us.
WHEN?
As much as I hate to pin labels on people relative to the political spectrum, I must say that any real effort to deal with "racism" in this society will have to be mounted from the left. I am still waiting for "progressives" to make the total committment to eradicating it from our society. We know where the 'right' comes from on this issue, but do we really know where the 'left' comes from?
As you know...
I have written about left wing racism and recognize it as a problem. Of course many argue about how much of racism in general is really classism and how much is racism. In my general experience what I have been most disgusted by among my Park Slope progressive peers is the classism. In general (and I am sure there are things I don't see and hear) a wealthy black family with the right brand of strollers and acceptable neuroses about where their kids will go to school may well fit in better in many Park Slope crowds than my wife and I would with our decidedly not proper approaches to pre-K education (hey, let the kid develop how he wants to!) and our used strollers. I have always pointed out that it is hard to ignore that the sharp economic gradient seen in Park slope as one goes from the park to the canal is matched by an inverse melanin gradient...but the rather irritating attitudes many people I know in Park Slope seem more to do with wealth, which baby boutique you shop at and whether you have your kid enrolled in Latin, chess and advanced Neitche by the time they reach their second birthday. The racism I encounter on the right seems more purely racism. What will happen to this country when a black man runs it...fear specifically of the skin color no matter what else. Added to this is often the sense that everyone is going to hell unless they are fundamentalist Christian (the attitude that threatens me personally the most). That combination of a god given (rather than wealth given) sense of racial (as opposed to wealth derived) superiority strikes me as worse...if there can be a better and worse of prejudice.
If I may use an extreme example, let me compare ancient Roman slavery with American slavery. The former was a situation where anyone of any race could be a slave and anyone of any race could earn their way to freedom and become a fully integrated member of society. Freed slaves of any race could be and often were full citizens of Rome. In American slavery the institution was specifically racially defined and even once freed, there was no way a black could be an equal citizen to even the poorest white...arguably even today. Both were brutal, barbaric, disgusting practices. One was purely economic, allowing a way out of the barbaric practice. THe other was racial, never allowing a full escape from the barbarity.
What bothers me more about the right wing version of prejudice in the current era is the anger and violence associated with it. Hate crimes are on the rise in Bush America (not sure the most recent statistics, but overall this is true) and the targets are largely due to right wing prejudices (e.g. anti-black, anti-immigrant, anti-gay...) and are well reflected in the rhetoric of the right wing "pundits" on national television and radio who openly denegrate and threaten those who are non-white, non-protestant, non-right wing, and non-male.
You do not get this combination of rage, threats, violence and prejudice on the left as far as I have seen, or at least rarely. It is an integral part of the Bush/McCain Republican culture, hence the draw of rabid fanatics like Hagee, Robertson, Fallwell, etc.
No one has a corner on the market of prejudice. But somehow I see something particularly disgusting, barbaric and widespread about right wing racism in the Bush era.
Read Some Of The Remarks
That are made on the Staten Island Advance Political Forum. I try not to reply to the stupid remarks made by bigots but it's frustrating that in this day and age people still mark remarks and have prejudices like this.
Why the left won't move
The problem is that almost everyone involved in "progressive, grass-roots" organizations is white, upper middle class, and aspiring in their professional lives to becoming what has been termed "limousine liberals." It stands to reason, then, that the real problems faced daily by members of other races just don't rise to a sufficient level of consciousness among such groups.
My own group, DFNYC, is a typical example. I have tried on occasion to raise this issue, and to reach out to people of color I meet in an attempt to get them to join. But without a more concerted effort (and so far there has been not only no effort, but also no desire to make an effort, or even an acknowledgement that such an effort needs to be made), DFNYC will remain almost exclusively white.
Only when minorities make up a significant portion of left-wing groups, especially at the upper levels, will the "left" do anything about racism. Meanwhile, it's much more convenient to use it as a political tool than to solve the problem.
Well
I know that what you say is the stereotype, and too often true. But there are groups like CBID which do have a noticable minority membership, and let's not forget one of the most successful progressive organizing efforts to date in Brooklyn: Barack Obama's campaign.
I agree with you that there has traditionally been a divide between the white progressives and minority communities. But I see far more bridging of that divide in Brooklyn right now than I have anywhere else. And one can only hope that the candidacy of Obama can bring together those two communities.
Yup.
Only when minorities make up a significant portion of left-wing groups, especially at the upper levels, will the "left" do anything about racism. Meanwhile, it's much more convenient to use it as a political tool than to solve the problem.
Been saying that for years. Don't have the answers for you, but it's striking how segregated the Progressive community really is. I first noticed this in 2004, canvassing in Ohio, that Democrats are those people who show up in black neighborhoods every four years asking for votes around October.
Agreed
It has to be done. And I think it is, albeit in excessively small ways.
Progressives had a lot to do with the election of two minority Surrogate judges in Brooklyn (I can hear Gatemouth revving up his anti-progressive rap, but progressives DID play a role). Among the close allies of progressives in Brooklyn are Chris Owens, Tish James, Eric Adams, Velmanette Montogomery. I am carrying petitions predominantly for black politicians. I think that has been the case every time I have carried petitions. Interestingly, progressives in Brooklyn have more contact with black politicians than they currently do with DFNYC, which has never really been able to do well in Brooklyn. I am not really sure what that means, to be honest. Although to give DFNYC credit, more often than not I see its members helping out minority candidates from Chris Owens to Diane Benson (Native American running in Alaska...not a DFNYC candidate but many fundraisers for her were done by DFNYC people).
Beyond even a connection between minority communities and progressives (a necessity) is the broader connection between progressives and all communities (an even bigger necessity). It is a matter of relevance. Are progressives relavent to the communities they purport to represent. If the answer is ever "no" then progressives had better do something about it. Blue Tiger Democrats seem to be defunct now, but they seemed to have the right idea. Democrats Work is another organization where a direct connection to the community is an important part of politics. I see this approach critical to the long term expansion of the progressive movement. Progressive efforts of all kinds, from this website to DFNYC to CBID etc. have to be relavent to the communities they want to work with. Relavence can come in two mutually complementary ways: you gotta look like those you want to represent (meaning community participation) and you gotta be helpful to those you want to represent (meaning the community has to feel you are benefitting them).
Eh.
What I really love is those people who have conniptions about how Obama is a scary Muslim, and in the next sentence get all frothy about his preacher.
It's basic cognitive dissonance at work. The good news is that he's leading in the polls, and the Electoral College is starting to look like a wipeout.
We've got a long way to go, but I like where we are.
Logic
Logic does not play as strong role in modern Republican thinking. Otherwise how would you get the idea that cutting school funding is good education policy or neglecting levees is a good idea or invading Iraq somehow has something to do with fighting al-Qaeda.


















Not just Republicans are bigots
There are two registered Democrats in my neighborhood who have told me that they will not vote for Obama, and his race is the reason. I put it that way because one of them is blaming the whole race for the failures of David Dinkins' mayoral term.
Bigotry, in all its forms, knows no party lines.