Devin Cohen Wins the Brooklyn Civil Court Race
Honesty, community dedication and postive campaigning won tonight over sleazy, lying, negative campaigning in Brooklyn's 1st Civil Court Race. Progresses won over conservatives.
I wish this could be simply a good celebration over a race well fought on both sides. But I cannot ignore the fact that Roger Adler ran one of the nastiest and worst campaigns I have ever seen and his choice to cynically smear a truely good gentleman is unforgivable. And many will not forget what he and his backers did when they chose to use Karl Rove's strategy to win. Fortunately, their attempt to win by lying lost. May McCain's similar approach also lose.
My friend, Devin Cohen, is genuinely an honest, nice guy. Every single person I have met who knows him agrees he will be an excellent judge. I have never seen anyone so slow to anger, so willing to listen to both sides of an issue and so fair in his judgements. Yet in the past months he was smeared by one of the sleaziest campaigns I had ever seen. My first impression of Roger Adler was that he was perfectly qualified but arrogant. But as the months passed all I saw was blatant lies. That culminated tonight as Adler himself, a candidate for a judicial seat, blatantly lied about Devin in public, claiming Devin was a tax cheat and failed to pay his taxes. Adler knew full well those were lies. Devin has always paid, in fact overpaid, his taxes and Adler knew that, but lied about it. Adler's election day palm card was, according to Josh Skaller, a past president of Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats, the ONLY negative palm card he had ever seen. Most palm cards try to convince you to vote for a candidate. Adler's, like all his lit, said nothing positive about himself, only more lies about Devin. Adler himself never ahd anything good to say about himself.
But it gets worse. One of Adler's campaign workers refused to comply with the electioneering rules and campaigned too close to the polls. He refused to leave so was arrested by the cops. I have NEVER heard of this. Cops never care that much on election day...as long as you keep to the legal boundaries of where to campaign. Adler's paid worker couldn't even do that!
Devin Cohen never went negative. Every piece of literature he sent out advocated for himself, and never criticized Adler. He made his case and mostly he made it face to face with the voters. And he won.
Behind Adler were two sleaze bags: Michael Tobman and Vito Lopez. Their smear campaign was among the nastiest I have ever seen outside of the Republican Party. Their lies were among the worst I have seen outside of the Republican Party. And their smear campaign cost more than twice as much as Devin's honest, positive campaign. And the sleazy three, Adler, Tobman and Lopez, failed. In fact, this is another Brooklyn failure for Lopez. He lost BOTH surrogate court races. And he now lost this one. Vito: you played this one quietly, but I know for a fact you were pulling strings behind the scenes, and now Tobman is working closer with you, isn't he?
Adler, Tobman and Lopez could have run a great campaign and made a positive case for Adler. I would have still thought Devin was the better candidate, but it would have been a harder race to win. Instead Adler, Tobman and Lopez went the Karl Rove route and lied blatantly. And lost.
Many people will remember this race. And I will write in far, far more detail about this in the near future.
For the other races I endorsed in, congratulations to Daniel Squadron (I will talk more about my choices in that race later) and Mike McMahon. And to Shelly Silver, you are still on notice. Incumbents are being challenged now and you are a target.
Civil Court Judge | election 2008 | The Honorable Devin Cohen

the good guy wins
I agree with Bouldin, your coverage helped Devin and hopefully opened your readers eyes with Roger Adler's horrible and disgusting campaign. Whoever ran his campaign should be ashamed. Hopefully he won't get hired again.
Thanks
Sometimes the good guy wins. And rumor has it Vito Lopez and Michael Tobman, the orchestrators of Adler's nasty and failed campaign, may be working together again in 2009. So we'll see if they fail as miserably and expensively again. I mean Vito Lopez is certainly losing the high profile judicial races these days. Can we beat him in city council races?
Congrats
Great running into you yesterday morning. As soon as Kimmy came home from work I sent him back out again to vote for Devin. Keep up the great work you are doing for all of us (that goes for all of you at Daily Gotham and Culture Kitchen).
And.... I still owe you some homemade ribs one of these days.

None of the mail
None of the mail I received said that your Cohen didn’t pay his taxes. They said he didn’t’ file them. One Adler mailing said that after being found “not approved” by the NYC Bar Association, he filed them and told people he was owed a refund.
I hope you tell your friend (at least in private) that if he had been found approved by the NYC Bar Association, the NY Times would have endorsed him (even after his being found “not approved,” the Times still didn’t endorse Adler).
A Times endorsement would have ended the race almost two weeks before primary day and Cohen would have won an easy victory. The only reason the election was close was that your friend gave the Adler campaign an issue it never should have had.
For the record
Adler was far less careful in his face to face encounters with voters on primary day. He was saying Devin didn't pay his taxes and was a tax cheat, two blatantly untrue statements. He said this repeatedly in front of witnesses.
As to the actual issues, the tax issue was fair game per se, if presented properly. Devin isn't the first person to make a tax mistake, and Adler SHOULD make use of it. And you may well be right that the tax issue made it close (though Adler's money helped). But to refer to it as tax fraud and to say to people's face that he didn't pay his taxes is lying and unethical. And to link it to the NY Bar meeting (which Adler's campaign did in public and private) is, as I have said, either a lie or breaking confidentiality, and hence unethical. I suspect the NY Bar is not pleased with the way that story has been reported and how Adler used it, and they shouldn't be pleased. They should be damned well embarassed that they were used so shamelessly. They made their decision for whatever reason and I don't fault them. I can't judge what I wasn't present at. But I will fault them if they let two bit hacks like Tobman and Adler either break their confidentiality or lie about them. I of course also question their judgement in approving someone who admitted publicly to trying to buy a judgeship, but since the confidentiality extends to Adler's meeting with them I do not and should not know how that was discussed and handled.
The NYT endorsement is separate, from what can tell. I have my suspicions there which may come out.
Congratulations To Devin And You
Devin will make a great Judge You and Joy put in many hours of hard work to get him elected I'm sure it was one of the defining factors that helped him.
You've made me really happy
with this news. Thanks to you and everyone who worked so hard for this result. It's a victory for clean campaigning and good government. I was more than glad to do my little bit for him - candidates as good as Devin don't come along that often.
On a day with very little to feel good about in the poltical arena,(of all the people I supported, Devin was the only winner), I feel really good about this.
Congratulations, Devin!














You deserve the credit for that.
In such a close race, I think your consistent coverage made the difference. Congratulations. I would have voted for Devin just based on what you wrote, and I'm sure I'm not alone.