Bill DeBlasio: We Told You So!
Councilman Bill DeBlasio has seemed to have never met a developer dollar he didn't like. Rumor has it he has admitted as much. But it is certain that he by and large sides quite proudly with any developer who pays lip service, no matter how far fetched, to affordable housing.
So Bill DeBlasio has believed Bruce Ratner, a man who has no record whatsoever in creating affordable housing, when he said the Atlantic Yards project would contain a gajillion units of affordable housing. DeBlasio ignored the fact that Ratner's plan for affordable housing wasn't even that affordable (even by Manhattan standards) and were as vague as can be as to when, where and how it would be built. We warned Bill DeBlasio that Ratner cannot be trusted to provide affordable housing. But DeBlasio has been one of way too many politicians willing to throw taxpayer money at Ratner's feet. The only person to outdo DeBlasio in the amount of taxpayer money offered to Ratner is Vito Lopez, who, right after Ratner's family donating to Lopez's political machine, offered so much taxpayer money to Ratner that even Mayor Bloomberg cried foul.
In 2006 many felt Councilman David Yassky sounded too open to Ratner's charms. True or not (and Yassky doesn't seem to feel his views have changed, but I feel his rhetoric has) David Yassky has increasingly become one of Ratner's main critics, siding with Councilwoman Letitia James, a long standing critic, in demanding very clear requirements for infrastructure improvements and more guarantees for the affordable housing Ratner has promised. Conversion or merely clarification, Yassky's views are much more in line with the community's now.
Now even Bill DeBlasio is starting to doubt the veracity of what Bruce Ratner says. According to the April 19 Brooklyn Paper, even Developer Dollar Bill is having second thoughts about Ratner's Atlantic Yards project.
Ratner has, in essence, publicly backed out of the entire affordable housing offer. To be fair, DeBlasio always claimed that the basis of his support was always the affordable housing, but he seemed way too gullible to be blieved, seemingly buying into everything Ratner promised. But now Ratner's nearly complete abandonment of the very basis for public funding of the project has finally made DeBlasio realize that Ratner has been lying through his teeth.
DeBlasio was quoted as saying:
We need to stop until there is a clear plan. The plans have changed, at least according to Ratner himself, so why should demolitions continue?
He went further by condemning the whole review process:
I've never seen something so fundamentally mishandled in terms of excluding the community [as Atlantic Yards]," said DeBlasio, who is running for Borough President.
Councilman Bill DeBlasio, where the HELL have you been? Many of us knew the affordable housing would never materialize or would materialize in a form that would become unaffordable rapidly. Many of us have been condemning the lack of community participation in the process. We have been TELLING you this for years now and that never stopped you from throwing more of OUR money to Ratner. Seriously, dude. We told you so. What took you so damned long to listen?
Oh...yeah. Now you're allegedly running for BP maybe you feel the community suddenly matters to you. Better actually be able to DO something about this project you helped shove down our throats before you ask us to believe your conversion.
affordable housing | Atlantic Yards | Urban Development | Bill DeBlasio
ACORN and Ratner
I have criticized ACORN in the past, though perhaps not often enough.
As to bursting bubbles, seems this bubble's bursting was the most anticipated in my lifetime. "No one could have predicted this bursting bubble" rings about as true as Bush's statement about the levees. And it seems like Ratner is still eager to get the taxpayer money without actually keeping the promises that the taxpayer money was contingent upon. He wants his subsidies without actually being a good citizen in return.
myopic
You paint DeBlasio with to broad a brush. He has a generally good record on housing.
Atlantic Yards isn't the only housing fight in New York City. It isn't even the only big housing fight in New York City.
But your post criticizes DeBlasio for agreeing with you now, as though Atlantic Yards is the only measure of affordable housing there is. It's hard for me to see how not giving anyone room to change their minds will help your cause. Simply put, you're losing. If the only people who can be against Atlantic Yards are people who have been against it from the start then you'll keep losing.
Not at all
First off, my criticism is in his taking so long. He was far too trusting of promises made by a greedy man who would give no guarantees. But he never listend much to the community.
As for "keep losing" I think it is clear that Ratner is the one slowly losing. He is abandoning more and more of his project and he is losing more and more supporters. Hakeem Jeffries, David Yassky and now Bill DeBlasio...all of them had seemed supporters, from luke warm to enthusiastic. All are souring and they are souring for precisely the same reasons many Ratner opponents have been talking about for a few years now. Sounds more like people are slowly realizing we may be right about the project.
NY1 Interviews Bruce Ratner
Bud Miskin of NY1 will have an interview with Bruce Ratner I believe Monday or Tuesday night and it should be interesting to hear what he has to say about Atlantic Yards and what's going on there.
















It took Bill a long time to
It took Bill a long time to split from his friends at ACORN, who are still in a pro-Ratner holding pattern, at least for now. Could this have been a case of Bill dancing with those who brung him?
Where then is the internal left/self-critical analysis that this website if tailor-made to mete out? ACORN has received a lot of criticism, but almost all emanates from those who live in the cite's footprint, and vrey little has ever examined the ideology unpinning its actions. This could be a fascinating topic. By contrast, calling politicans "sell-outs", even when meritited, does tend to get a bit tiresome, like calling dogs canines.
On a related topic, do you really believe that anyone within the Ratner organization anticpated a downscaling of the project of these proportions? Bruce Ratner is a lot of bad things, but self-destructiveness has so far not been among his vices. Maybe the impact of the economic crisis should have been anticipated, but if one looks aound, Ratner does not seem to be alone in his over-optimism. This does not, in itself, rule out bad faith (and even good faith would not excuse some of Atalntic Yards' flaws), but guessing wrong about a bursting bubble is not the same as running a purposeful scam, even if the ultimate impact makes the distinction one of little real difference.