The Joe Bruno Democrats (Pilot Episode)

Like a rabid dog in the last throes of delirium, Senate Republican Leader Joe Bruno is flailing about, wrecking as much havoc as possible before the inevitable. Unfortunately, as always, a Democrat has once again come to his rescue, helping him to live on to face another inglorious day of singing about the virtues of self-reliance while he and his allies rob every last dollar from the public till, because they can. At the end of the film, the cop looks at Jack Nicholson and says “It’s Albany, Jake”.

The only difference between this year and all the others is that this time the Democrat providing Bruno with his life raft has not done it intentionally. Mario Cuomo used to throw Warren Anderson and Ralph Marino bouquets. Eliot thought he was throwing Joe Bruno a rock, but it turned out to be a rope, and now Joe’s hanging him with it. Only in Albany could a Governor catch a legislative leader of the opposite party using state helicopters for political purposes and end up turning it to the leader’s advantage. Now, to top it off, the Governor’s found a way for a man who should be making license plates to be making hay from them instead. It is to weep.

Joe Bruno should be toast in the long term, and no one knows it better than he. His once robust majority has gradually evolved into a naturally occurring retirement community of old men sadly serving out terms of life imprisonment without parole on their way to the elephant’s graveyard. It survives in a hothouse environment supported by the artificial sunlight of member items, “member services”, legislation sold to the highest bidder, malapportionment and inertia; its greatest enemies are actuarial tables and changing demographics.

Bruno’s known this for years, but he’s had a strategy for the new century he’s gradually evolved over the last decade. Run 'em as Dems, keep em as Dems, but have their votes to organize the Senate if the Dems ever take the majority. It's called "the Kruger Plan".

The Senate Republican majority is doomed in the long-term unless they find a way to corral some non-Republicans into either switching parties or voting with them to organize. This has now been their long-range strategy for many years. They find "Democrats In Name Only" and run them in prohibitively Democratic districts, so they can hold them in reserve in case the Dems ever take the majority.

Example #1: Get washed up go-go dancer Nancy Larraine Hoffman, to change parties. Query: When Joe posed the idea, did she fall out of bed? When she told the Senate Dems she was screwing them all at once, did they think they were being invited to an orgy, or were they just bored? In Albany, Nancy was known as “The Tail of Two Parties” even before she switched sides. Actually, two parties would have been a slow night for her.

Example #2: Get Olga Mendez to switch parties. Even if I provided salacious details, who would believe them?

Example #3: Get Pedro Espada to change parties while maintaining his Democratic enrollment so he can still run in the Democratic Primary. The Democrats actually stopped this one by beating Bruno at his own game by running DINO Ruben Diaz. Diaz, Espada; both have Jewish messiahs, but one follows Jesus and the other Fred Newman.

Example #4: Woo Diaz. That'll teach 'em.

Exampla #5: Run Guillermo Linares against Eric Schniederman. Joe Bruno trying to screw Schniederman; it’s the arrogance of power versus the power of arrogance.

Example #6: Give Nellie Santiago the Republican line and try to draw the Satmar into her district. This was only foiled because George Pataki owed Santiago enemy Vito Lopez a bigger favor.

Example #7: Get Democratic Assemblyman Joe Robach to switch parties and run for the Senate. This was abetted by Shelly Silver, who was glad to have Robach gone.

Example #8: Run Noach Dear in the Democratic Primary against divided black opposition. Tried it three times, would have done it a fourth, but Dear (he hopes) got a job that doesn’t require commuting. Between Santiago and Dear, Vito Lopez has done more to foil Joe Bruno accidentally than most county leaders, himself included, have done on purpose.

Example #9: Run Democratic Assemblyman Steve Kaufman in the Democratic Primary against Jeff Klein, while also attempting to run him as a Republican, Conservative and Independence. This was abetted by Shelly Silver, who was glad to have Kaufman gone.

Example #10: Get political transsexual Tony Herbert, already surgically remade as a Republican, to pretend to have his Democratic credential reattached, and run him against Velmanette Montgomery.

Rule of thumb: not every primary challenge to a Senate Democratic incumbent stems from Bruno, and some of the Senate Demorats may even deserve primaries [especially the one(s?) owned by Bruno] but, generally, if there's talk of giving a Senate Dem a primary, one should, at the very least, go hunting for the man behind the curtain.

Example #11: Carl Kruger; already bought and paid for, many times over, but like a case of the clap, or Nancy Larraine Hoffman, Kruger is the gift that keeps on giving. Worth an article all his own; will get one soon.

#12: Woo Hiram Montseratte and attend his fundraiser. This is being aided and abetted by John Sabini and Jack Daniels. Sabini may end up the only person in his immigrant heavy district unable to get a driver’s license. Does Sabini really have a drinking problem? Have you any idea who he’s dated?

The only question is what’s the next move? My guess is that they are preparing to run Marty Golden supporter Matthieu Eugene in East Flatbush. Rock Hackshaw guesses it will be Una Clake.

But it’s more that just that. If Bruno was unable to find a Democrats to change parties, or to be his Trojan horse or wolf in sheep’s clothing, he was always able to find other ways to acquire their support for Republicans. The sad history of Democratic Governors, Assembly Speakers, State Chairs and County Leaders showing less than acute interest in taking the Senate has been well documented, especially by me. This piece, http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/nolo_contendre.html, contains links documenting all of this and more. But this was no longer enough for Joe Bruno. He needed innovation to bring his conference, limping and lame, into the 21st century.

A race in 2002 set new precedents for how far Joe Bruno could go in buying off local Democratic party officials, with no one taking any steps to enforce discipline. This was the race where incumbent Vinnie Gentile’s district was decimated in reapportionment, as the Republicans prepared to beat him with Bay Ridge Councilman Marty Golden.

Let me talk a little about Mr. Golden. “Progressives” like Chris Owens have sought to vilify County Leader Vito Lopez for the sweet deal developer Bruce Ratner got in the recently passed 421-A tax abatement legislation, laying the blame entirely upon Lopez. And certainly, Lopez acquiesced in this sordid little deal. But the “progressive” blogocracy has been so eager to use this as a bludgeon to beat Lopez that they’ve ignored the real culprit. As virtually only left blogger Daniel Millstone has pointed out, the 421-A bill did a lot to benefit residents of poor neighborhoods, which was clearly Lopez’s priority. To get what he wanted, Lopez admits to acquiescing to the demands of the Senate Republicans, who cared only about the Real Estate Board’s #1 priority, Mr. Ratner (as they sold out hundreds of other landlords; I’d cry if it weren’t so funny). It’s all documented in a June 29, 2007, New York Times article. The ringleader carrying Mr. Ratner’s water: Marty Golden. Yet, the “progressive” blogocracy puts all the blame on Lopez, and ignores, for perhaps the first and only time, the opportunity to bash a Senate Republican. Aren’t their priorities somewhat out of whack? Well, they may be Progressive Democrats, but they're still Brooklyn Democrats, so I guess it's only natural that they go a little soft on Marty Golden.

The 2002 race where Golden won election was an historical landmark. It was nothing new for Brooklyn Democrats to endorse Republicans for President, Governor and Mayor, but never had Brooklyn Dems jumped ship, en masse, to desert a local incumbent. Nonetheless, one had to forgive them, for they only gave up their support after hours of torture being forced to contemplate huge piles of cash, pork and patronage. Five members of the Democratic State Committee jumped ship, as did an incumbent Councilmen, Assemblyman and, incredibly, a Democratic State Senator. And no one was punished. In fact, the conspirators prospered; one became a judge.

The next year, to show there were no hard feeling, some of the conspirators actually backed Gentile for the remainder of Golden’s Council term. How perfect. Much better to have a Democratic Councilman and a Republican State Senator than the other way around. Good for the neighborhood. Good for Brooklyn. This race became the model for Joe Bruno’s dream operation, and epitomizes the obstacles in the way of a Democratic Senate (although a few honorable heroes like District Leader Bernie Catcher and Councilman Dominick Recchia stood out from the muck).

As such, I have taken names, and will be naming them; I’m fully pumped and loaded for bear, as I embark upon the beginning of what I intend to become a regular and recurring series: “The Joe Bruno Democrats”. The particular focus of this series will be to name and exfoliate all the “Democrats” who jumped shipped on the party in the 2002 Golden/Gentile race, as an example to others that such behavior will no longer be tolerated. I will be cruel and unusual in my punishment, far exceeding the bounds of decency. But I promise not to use the resources of the State Police or the Internal Revenue Service.

Yes, the obvious names will be covered: Carl Kruger and Dov Hikind will be exposed for who they are for the 150th time. Mention will be made of their indictments, even though no criminal convictions resulted. Any guilt I may harbor for such cheap shots will not trouble me in the least when talking about the Garson Crime Family and their actual criminal convictions.

But we will also delve into areas unexpected. Unfortunately, the series will not name all of those who sat on their hands and did nothing, or otherwise took a dive, for there are only some many days in the year. Sleep easy Bill DeBlasio, no one will find out you ignored the Gentile/Golden race because you were busy expending all of your resources in a Sunset Park Special Election for Council between three Democrats with identical positions on every issue but their choice for Council Speaker (not to mention how you withheld Clinton money from the Senate Dems in 2000 to punish them for having Carl Kruger within their ranks, as if that wasn't punishment enough).

Instead, we will endeavor to name all the out and out collaborators. Not merely the obvious ones, but the surprises as well. And, in fact, we shall start off our series with a surprise guest: Stay Tuned Next Time as we decimate Progressive Hero (come lately) Steve Harrison.

http://dailygotham.com/blog/gatemouth/the_joe_bruno_democrats_pilot_episode
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
0
Gatemouth's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mole333's picture

Of course...

Of course the number one problem remains Vito Lopez who continues to do no voter registration, actively DISCOURAGING Democratic voter Registration, and actively discouraging anyone who floats a run against a Republican...until Recchia comes along. Funny how the machine focuses almost exclusively on primaries and very rarely on the general elections when there is a serious Republican.

If Vito was as serious about leading the Democratic Party to victory in Brooklyn as he is dominating the party, I might like him better.

So if you are going to blame those you currently oppose, I am hoping Vito Lopez himself will be front and center of your blame. I know many who have floated the idea of running people against Golden and (in the past) Fossella and were told a flat out "no."

Not yet rated.
Michael Bouldin's picture

Heh.

So you're going to - your words, not mine - "decimate" Harrison, who's running against Noach Dear Democrat Steve Recchia? The same Harrison that voted against his club endorsing that vile bigot?

My feeling would be that this only helps Fossella, who last I checked has an R next to his name, so I'd suggest that's not a good use of your time.

A machine candidate like Recchia is not going to find support around here, very certainly not after his outrageous betrayal of the Dear endorsement. I've said this before: this is a dealbreaker. Anyone who willingly and knowingly throws my civil rights under the bus is not going to be the object of panegyrics here.

There is nothing that Steve could do to equal Recchia. End of story, even if you wish to elevate a total of two checks that he's written to the level of Noach Dear.

Not yet rated.
Gate's picture

So predictable

I excoriate Joe Bruno, and outline his modis operandi in unsparing detail, like practically no one has before, and all you guys can talk about is Harrison and Vito.

Mole: if you have more information on supressing Golden's opposition, I'd love to hear about it. I was only able to find one article, and it confirmed what I already knw, which was that it seemed to be the work of one member of the Assembly. I suspect others as well, including the Democratic Assembly Campaign Committee. I even alluded to this last yeat. If you have more, please report it; too little, too late is still better than nothing and never.

Bouldin, I understand how you feel about the Dear thing, but forgetting Recchia for a moment, it does not seem to justify consignment to hell for eternity of Diana Svaino, who may be the most liberal pol to represent a part of Staten Island since Marty Connor was reapportioned out of the north shore in 1992.

The way you outline it, it does sound awful, and frankly, it was awful, but it was still a pro forma endorsement, which delivered virtually nothing to a guy who apparently didn't need it.

Slap Recchia if you want, slap him silly, if you like; it will render a lesson, but not necessarily only the one you seek to deliver. Although, you should remember that Recchia's sought and won the Lambda endorsement in all his races, which took place in less than gay-friendly turf, and in his first few months on the Council, voted to extend the City's human rights law to protect the transgenedered. He's stuck his neck out, when others, such as Harrison, didn't even seek the Lambda endorsement (and didn't get it).

Recchia's record deserves consideration, and to deny that is to be politically shortsighted about the impact ingratitide has upon politicans in the world at large when considering how to vote on gay issues. The lesson you may be sending is that it ain't worth it to vote your conscience, because the ingrates still won't cut you any slack. That conclusion may be wrongheaded, but that doesn't mean it won't happen, cause it will.

As to Stevie Wonder, it wasn't only two checks (at least 5 or 6 large ones to Golden alone, that year, and there are other embarrassments as well). Moroever, in the context of Harrsion's entire donation hisotry, they tell quite an interesting story which I will soon outline in detail. It ain't pretty. And it raises all sorts of question about ideology and prnciples, or the lack thereof. The best case sceanario is opportunism, the worst is reaction (or perhaps it is the other way around), all I can say is you'll see.

So maybe I'm just insensitive, but to me, a wrongheaed, but meaningless, pro forma endorsement by a pol with a spotless record with the affected community gets trumped by an effort (and it wasn't only just money) to maintain in power the ugliest point in the Albany bi-partisan triangle, especially when that effort is in the context of a series of donations indicating the contributor is either a reactionary or a strumpet (take your pick)

So you may be right (though I doubt it), but it sure ain't an open and shut case.

Not yet rated.
mole333's picture

Come off it

You know we know where you're going with this one, even if you didn't give it away in your last paragraph. Don't play the innocent lamb. You call it predictable, but that's because we see through you.

And I really am interested in how you can make Steve look more of an enabler for Republicans than Vito Lopez, who endorsed Giuliani, Pataki (twice), Bloomberg (more or less) and, of all people, AL D'Amato. If you are going to be doing a series like this, you really have to show logical priorities, and going right to Vito Lopez is where you should go. Slam him, already, if you want credibility on this issue. You may have a reasonable case excusing Recchia (we disagree, but fine) but to skip over Vito and go for Steve is unlikely to convince.

As to Steve's record, I am fine seeing what you have to show. I have talked to Steve extensively on the issue and feel he can stand up to it and come out pretty damned convincing.

I also find it fascinating that you accuse the guy who busted his butt last time around to fight Fossella of opportunism while favoring the guy who is jumping in when the wind seems to be blowing more favorably. If you want a dictionary definition of opportunism, I'd say Recchia is displaying it right now vis a vis NY-13. It is part of why I am finding him so unappealing, particularly right next to the Noach Dear opportunistic endorsement.

As to Vito and the Senate, well, you know how such info goes. I can't give you the proof I would like to. Which means I can't expect you to believe it, except you do know me and know I am far more likely to go for a party leader who refuses to help defeat Republicans than one who does well in that area. But feel free to dismiss it for lack of proof I can show you publicly.

Not yet rated.
Gatemouth's picture

I didn't dismiss it....

..., and i don't find it incredible, just unproven. Frankly the more exposure we have of such stuff, the less likely it is to occur in the future, so I was hoping you had something. All i have is Peter Abbate bragging how stopping a candidate against Golden got them Hyer-Spencer. I made fun of that attitude back in November, it is surely linked in the piece I linked, but more info is better info.

As to where I was going, you are pre-supposing that I am going to do a whole series just to get Steve Harrison. Sorry, but a quick search will indicate my unhealthy obsession with Carl Kruger, and that parts of this piece have been posted, mostly anon, in diffrent forms, several times. That i recently ran across the Harrison stuff, which I've sort of known all along for years, but never did document, is mostly a happy coincidence (a Democratic Senator I know was shocked by the details). However, I will admit that the endless Recchia baiting going on here did inspire me to frontload Steve, rather than saving him for later. His name is, after all, the biggest surprise I've got.

As to comparisons of Harrison to Vito Lopez, they are largely irrelevant, although, issue by issue, I'd bet Lopez is more liberal. The comparison is to Recchia, who endorsed one Republican (Bloomberg, who's more liberal on social issues than Harrison) in his life, and never ever gave a check to the Conservative Party Campaign Committee (barf me out and gag me with a spoon).

Can't wait to Harrison's excuse for that one.

Not yet rated.
mole333's picture

Pre-supposing

Well, I do know what led up to these diaries. Shall we call it Recchia damage control? Not saying you don't have other things to say, but I also feel pretty safe knowing what one of your main purposes is in doing this. Weren't expecting us all to take the Dear Situation seriously?

Go ahead and post what you have on Steve. We are all about information here. I will then encourage him and/or his campaign to respond if they feel like it. What I do know is that Marty Golden and Steve Harrison had been working together while Marty Golden was a Democrat and it continued into the early days of Golden becoming a Republican but in the end Golden became too conservative for Harrison's tastes and those Democrats who had most reason to be pissed at Harrison for his support of Golden supported Harrison in 2006. In some cases quite strongly. So, to date you haven't revealed anything that doesn't make Steve anything but reasonable and a good fit for his district which DOES, last I saw, include some Republicans who will be his constituents as well.

As far as Steve's stands on the issues, the main things I know are: he is solidly for withdrawal from Iraq, he supports better security for our ports, he supports marriage equality, and he is personally uncomfortable with abortion but considers it a woman's choice. This is what I know off the top of my head (and he will correct me if I have gotten any nuances wrong). I see nothing there that I object to.

So those are the things I know right now. Inform me.

Not yet rated.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

User login