Search
KGIA Travesty Continues
Well, if this isn’t the ultimate irony, I don’t know what is. The Stop the Madrassa Group (SMG), the organization responsible for the attack on the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA) before it even opened, is now calling for the closing of the school on the grounds that it has become “chaotic.â€
The group issued a press release yesterday calling for an “immediate investigation into chaotic conditions at Arabic Public School.†The Group is correct in stating that there is chaos at the school. What it fails to explain is that this chaos is a direct result of their spreading vicious lies, resulting in the loss of the school’s founding principal and the continued failure to support the school by the DOE.
As is their usual tactic, the SMG is distorting the truth to fit their needs. The truth is that as soon as Debbie Almontaser, the school’s founding principal resigned, a series of events were set into motion that have led to the school’s inevitable failure to fulfill its intended mission. Their accusations are like someone who throws a grenade into a building and then complains about the building being a shambles.
With Debbie Almontaser at its helm, the school was designed to be a “multicultural oasis of community, connection, and learning.†As soon as Debbie resigned, the vision began to be ripped apart. Debbie resigned in the belief that the school would be able to continue if the controversy that surrounded her was abated. When she realized that the school was under attack despite her resignation, she applied for the job as she would have had to do had she not resigned.
School principals are chosen through a process in which parents, teachers and administrators have input – the C-30 process. The DOE did not allow Debbie’s application to be considered in that process, thus taking that choice from those with the most right to make the choice. But even worse than not allowing Debbie’s application to be considered is the DOE’s complete abandonment of the school and the vision that it was obligated to support.
The school was envisioned to be a place where students, teachers, parents and community members could come together to learn and grow together. The original proposal envisioned parents and community members as actively involved in the school. According to KGIA teachers, however, parents are not even allowed in their children’s classrooms.
The original proposal envisioned intensive Arabic instruction enabling students to graduate as bilingual speakers. Now, even though foreign languages classes are typically taught 4-5 times a week in public schools, in this school dedicated to the learning of Arabic, Arabic classes have been cut back to a mere 3 times a week.
The school which supposedly has the full support of the DOE, has been provided with inadequate space, inadequate materials and has not integrated Arabic culture into the curriculum - one of the primary purposes of the school’s creation. KGIA has become less than a shell of what it was intended to be. KGIA is not only being denied the support and resources needed to fulfill its mission but worse, it is being denied the support and resources critical for it to be a quality school of any kind.
For more information about KGIA, see the website for the Coalition in Support of KGIA




Reformulation of the goals?
I am personally repulsed by the tactics of those opposed to this school. And, as you may remember, I am not really a supporter of the school. I am leery of the school because I believe such programs should be implemented as city-wide diversity programs, not school-specific programs that focus on one cultural tradition. I would be equally leery of a Hebrew based school in the public school system and I was as leery of the homosexual specific school.
Personally I think the vision of the school would be better served, and more palatable to those of us who are not bigots but are still leery of the current program, if it was broader. A Middle East program, perhaps, including Persian, Turkish, Egyptian, Armenian and Hebrew as language and cultural elements of the program, perhaps? Not just Arabic. Something that made it a broader focus would help me, at least.
That said, I agree that some of the opposition has been prejudiced in a way I am uncomofortable with. THe opposition has made me more supportive of the school despite my reservations about this kind of (in my mind) overly specific curriculum.