Search
Money Laudering
(Yup, this too is on my website.)
Is there a rift between uber-wealthy Michael Bloomberg and Ron Lauder? Reports are all over the place, and rumors are flying. Let's try to make some sense out of it, bearing in mind that I have no access to either of the principals.
First, we have term limits in place, and in their current two-term limit, because Ron Lauder spent millions of dollars to create a referendum and shepherd it through, and then turn back an attempt to extend them. If it weren't for Lauder's money, we probably wouldn't have term limits in place, and Michael Bloomberg might not have run, much less been elected mayor.
In both cases, it was Lauder's money that funded the effort, but the voters decided.
Now that billionaire Bloomberg, who has spent a lot of his own money on several campaigns and political fights aside from his own, doesn't want to leave at the end of his two-term limit. He also, apparently, doesn't want to put the question before the voters, fearing, perhaps, that even by spending millions of dollars he wouldn't be able to win.
So he recruited Ron Lauder. Lauder and Bloomberg are old friends (or at least acquaintances), so it's pretty easy for them to pick up a telephone and call each other. Bloomberg got Lauder on board, or so it seemed.
Then it turned out that there was a back room deal. Lauder would come on board, but only if he got to be on a Charter Revision Commission. Now it appears that Lauder doesn't favor a permanent extension of term limits, just an exception for his good friend Michael Bloomberg. Despite the lack of connection by the media, these two bits of news may be very tightly connected.
Michael Bloomberg wants to extend term limits, not because he has any aversion to term limits, or because he feels the limit should be three terms, but because he wants to run again. Ron Lauder wants to extend term limits, but only so that Michael Bloomberg can run again, not for anyone after that. And Lauder will be on a Charter Revision Commission that can put changes to term limits to a referendum.
So ... Bloomberg gets his "permanent" extension and runs again. Then, after the election, the "Lauder Commission" recommends reducing the term limits back to two terms. Then Lauder (and presumably Bloomberg) spend millions of dollars to convince the voters that their way is best.
Disgusting! Or, as some people might put it, Politics!
Committee hearing scheduled
NY1 is reporting that the hearing on the term limits bill will be in the evening, so that more people can testify. It will be on October 16 (Thursday). Exact time and location to follow.
If you want to speak, contact me at dan - at - danjacoby.com. I'm organizing a bloc.
I just heard Councilman
I just heard Councilman Domenic Recchia on 1010 WINS in an interview thinks it's a great idea to overturn term limits. He should recuse himself & any other Councilmember too, if they received any monies from Mayor Mike if a vote does come before the Council. We know Recchia got about an extra $ 2 million, Felder got an extra $ 5 million from Mayor Mike, in any court in this land this would be pereived as being paid & bought for. These BUMS must be held accountable for their votes on the City Council. I tried to call Recchia's office but they just don't answer or hang up. Three terms for Recchia: NO HOW. NO WAY. NO RECCHIA.
Recchia
Happens to be my Councilman and a total waste except for his friends the Sitt family.
What's in it for Recchia? How about another 4 years at over $100,000 per year for a parttime job. Seems he got thrown out of the CD-13 run, would have lost to DeBlasio in a primary for Borough President and Lopez hasn't annointed him for a judgeship as yet.
This is about as legal
as Bush v. Gore. I'm proud of my councilmember, who's leading the fight against this naked power grab by two billionaires. Look for my e-mail.
The smoking gun!
Ron Lauder released a statement that proves the fix is in:
Anyone who is serving their first term is screwed by this deal, and we are all screwed, not just in the obvious ways, but also because just about the entire city government would be limited out in 2013.
What Makes You Think They Won't Want To Make This Permanent?
Why give up after 3 terms? Why not 4, 10 or forever? Bloomberg takes no salary so for him it's ego but the others will lose over $100,000 for their parttime jobs.