This shouldn't be news, but it is
Tracey Brooks, running for Congress in the 21st District, sent out a remarkable press release today.
Democratic Congressional candidate Tracey Brooks today announced the launch of her online advertising campaign, posting her first ad to The Albany Project, www.thealbanyproject.com, a leading political and campaign blogosphere resource.[...]
"We're so excited to launch our first online ad -- and do it on a blog -- as we continue to bring our message of change directly to the people in new and exciting ways," said Brooks.
"We are the first campaign to post an online ad, as we were the first to reach thousands of voters in a single night through a telephone town hall meeting. We were also the first to launch YouTube videos, online volunteer registration, online fundraising, and internet social networking tools." [Emphasis added]
What's remarkable is that she's right: her campaign is the first in this entire cycle to buy an ad on a blog. Think about this for a moment: only one campaign in the state of New York has bought an ad on a Progressive blog for the 2008 elections. Or maybe that's not so much remarkable as it's sad.
Think about this for a moment: if you're running for office, what would you do to cheaply and effectively reach your core audience, the people who are interested in politics, people who do things like volunteer and donate to campaigns? You could do worse, frankly, than spending a few hundred bucks, and that's really all it costs, to buy an ad on a blog. This is not neurosurgery, it's common sense. As an aside, I deal with candidates eseentially every day wondering how they can replicate Obama's success online. Guess what? The man spent millions of dollars online. That's how that happened.
And it's certainly not the case, one might add, that candidates - or organizations, or campaigns, or whomever - have no interest in blogs. As evidence, I submit my email inbox, which overflows with press releases, announcements, and pretty regularly, with emails from friends, acquaintances and complete strangers asking to plug their fundraising event for some candidate I probably have never heard of and could care less about.
But oddly enough, the next logical progression in what seems like a natural train of thought gets made by almost nobody. That progression is buying an ad. On this blog, you can do that here. It makes no sense to me that you'd get on the phone with me, for example, and spend half an hour of your valuable time trying to pitch me on something - like the candidate who once called me five times in one day - and not understand that you can have your exposure for a couple of bucks without having to deal with me.
Here's that link to buy an ad, again.
So really, the next time you think of sending out your press release or pick up that phone to flog some stuff, how about you buy an ad? Seriously? Believe it or not, running a blog actually costs money. Nobody's getting rich here, by the way. But if you think we do this merely because we all have trust funds and spend our days waiting for your phone calls, you're mistaken. We're activists, and if you're interested in supporting activism, how about spending a few bucks, instead of taking for granted that the blogs exist to spread your message at no cost to you?
Advertising | Blogs | Tracey Brooks
Nonsense.
No amount of coverage can give someone the constant exposure of running an ad, not to mention adding in message control, a direct pitch for whatever someone wants, and so on and so forth.
And as noted, running this blog is not cost-free. What we do benefits candidates, why shouldn't they invest in us and other blogs? Candidates go out of their way these days to engage the online community, but every single one of them stops short of backing that engagement with even the smallest amount of funding for what we do.
The more I think about this, the less sense it makes.
Yep
And sometimes a Dem just might want to push his/her message in a primary. We are split here on Squadron/Connor. Getting ads up would be reasonable for both campaigns. Consider the message if someone like McMahon or Foley got ads up here. How about some of them mayoral candidates. Cheap way to get your name out early among insiders. And what about that Republican candidate in the NY-13 race?
















Why buy an ad on a blog?
Seriously, what's the point? Blogs are full of info on candidates already, and are read by people who are far better informed than the general public (or even the voting public). A candidate buying an ad on a blog is like trying to sell ice to Eskimos. Candidates should spend their money where it can make a difference. How many of you are likely to be swayed by an ad, considering you probably have more facts (especially facts the candidate doesn't want to talk about) than an ad will give you?
It is possible for a candidate who is, for some unknown reason, "under the radar" to get a lift from an ad on a blog, but if that's the case, the chances are that candidate hasn't been running a good campaign. After all, it's cheaper simply to post to the blog -- and far more effective.