Search
The strange case of the anonymous emails
The first email came at 12:41, the second at 5:38. The first was entitled "SPITZER'S ABUSE OF POWER", the second, "Spitzer Caught Spying"; both were sent by updates@nyfacts.net.
The same email went to Phillip at The Albany Project, Jay Jochnowitz at the Times-Union and Liz Benjamin at the Daily Politics. Presumably, more people got it as well.
The emails contained the full version of two slash-and-burn pieces by Fred Dicker of the New York Post, dedicated, as the subject lines suggest, to the Bruno-Spitzer conflict.
Nyfacts.net is, as the TU points out, carefully shielded to mask the identity of whomever put it up. The TU followed up:
NYFacts.net didn’t respond to an e-mail inviting it to tell more about itself. A visit to Web sites with variations of the name turned up blank pages (not “page not found†errors, though). The .com versions led to ads for a firm offering ways to earn money on the Internet.
Moveover, a check of NYFacts.nets’ Internet registry shows that whoever create [sic] it took extra steps to shield its identity. Its registration was dated
todayMonday, using a special proxy service that offers private registration.Bruno’s office said it knows nothing about this.
So here's the really funny thing: this email didn't go to any of the regular Daily Gotham email accounts, the ones linked on this site and used in normal correspondence. It went instead to my account on the New Democratic Majority domain. And that's curious.
I use that email address mainly for my correspondence relating to NDM; on Daily Gotham business, I use my Daily Gotham email. However, there is no conceivable way that anyone linked to Joe Bruno could have the email that this went to. That's just not possible.
We've seen several anonymous web sites pop up in New York politics over the last few years. First, there was StopBloomberg.com; then, StopYassky.com. I've corresponded with both, and notably, both of these efforts were Democratic ventures. Given that I've used the NDM email strictly and exclusively for business related to Democratic politics, I'm reasonably sure that whoever is behind this effort is, in fact, a Democrat, more to the point, a politically active Democrat. It's completely impossible that anyone could deduce the particular email address that the NYFacts.net email went to from any context on The Daily Gotham.
The conclusion is clear: whoever sent this knows that the person who uses my NDM account, namely myself, is also the editor of The Daily Gotham. And that in turn is a very small crowd, maybe, at best, sixty or seventy people, all Democrats. Perhaps somebody really needed the money.




Never asssume
First, you assume that everyone involved in NDM and a few other Democratic activities is an actual Democrat and not an infiltrator. Foolish boy.
Second, you assume that none of the e-mails you sent using your NDM address ever got forwarded to anyone "outside" -- again, a totally unfounded assumption.
Third, you assume that nyfacts.net is a serious effort to push a right-wing agenda, which is probably true ... but only probably. It should be noted that if you go to that "website" you get only a blank page. At least, that's what I got -- I shouldn't assume everyone else gets the same thing.
Well, true enough
...but this seems like a continuation of the anonymous web smear series we've seen previously. I actually just got another email
Looks familiar
I think I got similar emails. Deleted them unread because I get so much crap I really have to be selective what I even look at!
Me Too
I got them on an account I only use for stuff like ordering on Amazon.com. I don't use it for politics or personal stuff.
I think this same email address sent me an invitation to the "Fat Cats for Spitzer" anti-Spitzer fundraiser a couple of months ago.
Me too
I also got these emails (new one this morning re: The New York Times is Wrong about Spitzer).
The odd thing for me is that the emails come to an address that I phased out of use for anything other than ordering online and stuff like that, years ago. I don't use it for political stuff at all.
I feel like these are the same people who invited me twice (on the same day) to attend the "Fat Cat's [sic] for Spitzer" event a couple of months ago.