The speech Eliot should give
Eliot Spitzer's ID Card proposal is in free fall. His nominal allies are putting some daylight between themselves and the governor; admonishing editorials and stories published today are here, here, here and here; Joe Bruno, God help us, was on Lou Dobbs last night; and to put whipped cream and a cherry on top of the debacle, Darren Dopp is now refusing to testify in the earlier Spitzer/Bruno spat.
In short, Eliot is pretty much looking at a perfect political storm, one of his own creation, one might add. As we noted yesterday, the discussion of this proposal - which coincidentally is sound policy that would benefit the state - is officially off the rails.
So what to do? The governor could save himself, the remainder of his agenda, the prospects of Democrats in the election a few days away - and more importantly, in the election now a year away - and perhaps even his ID card policy, but to do that, he needs to give a speech like this one.
My fellow New Yorkers,
I come to you today with a message I would prefer not to have to give you, but see little choice in delivering: I have made a mistake. You may have heard of it. It concerns my policy to give all residents of this state a state drivers license regardless of immigration status.
Now, don't get me wrong: the mistake is not in the policy itself. That policy is sound. You don't get people like Richard Clarke and Bill Bratton to endorse a given policy if it has negative consequences for the people's security.
Rather, my mistake was this: I did not first reach out to you, my fellow citizens, to get your support before announcing this policy. However, in a democracy, the people need to be heard, no matter how much their government is convinced of its rightness on a given subject. You were not heard before my administration announced its decision, and in consequence, you are angry. Let me be the first to say that you have every right to be angry.
In consequence, my administration has created a citizen commission to further study the question of road safety and the criteria for issuing state ID cards. This commission will travel the state and hear your concerns before any new policy is adopted.
But let me say a few words about the firestorm that has engulfed my administration. You elected me a bit less than a year ago to fix Albany. I'm pleased to report that we have made great strides in fulfilling this mandate. Every step along the way, however, I have encountered, we have encountered, the entrenched opposition of the Albany status quo, at its most recalcritant in Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno.
My good friend Joe and his caucus are now adopting an unfamiliar pose to anyone knowledgeable about their record, as your defenders from a detached, arbitrary governor. The words rich, spoiled brat have even been used. I'm here to tell you that this is, indeed, nothing but a pose: what they're defending is not you. They're defending themselves, their earmarks, their salaries, all the many ways in which they've done very well for themselves out of running your state government.
Their record is this: a withering upstate economy, a campaign finance system that is the object of scorn and derision everywhere, a system of crony capitalism that rewards political ties to the republican party over actual business success, a legislature that is completely and entirely unresponsive to you, the citizens.
That's what they're defending as they mount the barricades over my ID card proposal. That proposal is merely the occasion of their outrage; the cause is their fight to preserve their privileges and power. My mistake was that I played into this, and that I didn't first speak to and solicit the support of the people of New York.
New Yorkers, all of us, have a choice to make. We can either go forward together, reforming this state and unleashing its true potential with open, honest, transparent and active Progressive government. That's what you voted for last November. That's what you're not getting from Joe Bruno, what you'll never get from Joe Bruno. This is the man that hired the detritus of Watergate to advise him. This is the man who is currently under FBI investigation. This is the man who uses your tax dollars to fly to fundraising events - your money is paying for the funding he needs to continue to be able to not do your business.
My administration has made mistakes. I have made mistakes, chief among them that I didn't listen to you often enough. That's going to change. You, the people of New York, will always have an open ear in my administration and in my office. You deserve nothing less. And I promise you this: I will deliver for you.
Come now, let us go forward together.
Advice is a dangerous gift. But Eliot needs to get out there and listen to the people; and the people, it would appear, are presently none too pleased with him.
Albany Dysfunction | ID Card Proposal | Eliot Spitzer
I think the proposed speech is good but
unless accompanied by actual listening, useless.
The REAL Speech Eliot Should Give
In an episode of Comedy Central’s “South Park†a few seasons back, the cast came to the conclusion that after twenty-five years, it was OK to poke fun at the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Rudy Giuliani, with his incessant, politically opportunistic invocation of 9/11 has managed to make that national tragedy a staple of late night comedy in just six years.
Mr. Giuliani is not alone in trivializing the threat of international terrorism by using it to advance a political agenda. New York Republicans led by Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno and Assembly Minority Leader James Tedisco, in absurdly asserting that Governor Eliot Spitzer’s plan for granting motor vehicle operators’ licenses to undocumented aliens is abetting terrorists, their colleague Brooklyn state Senator Martin Golden for asserting that the state’s toleration of cigarette tax avoidance by Native American smoke shops is bankrolling terrorist attacks and the Bush administration’s penchant for characterizing a number of unfriendly governments as the primary sponsors of terrorism are all doing a distinct disservice to our national security.
The United States went to war in Iraq -- alleged by the Bush administration to be one of those “state sponsors†-- in an all-out frontal assault on terrorism. Toward that end, we have also spent untold billions turning our nation into the hardest target in history. This has accomplished nothing but a colossal waste of money and human life and to demonstrate to terrorists and would-be terrorists around the world that they can provoke us into an expensive, distracting and debilitating response by hitting a newsworthy target, preferably on American soil and targeting civilians. As we have seen, they can do so pretty cheaply. And as we all hope we never see, New York City and Washington, DC are hardly the only tempting targets.
It is time to knock off the political opportunism and the lurid media infotainment and put the problem of terrorism in true perspective. Groups like al Qaida would not be able to project their hatred very far were it not for the existence of a global network of transnational organized crime. It is driven by greed, not creed or grievance -- a motivation that does not fade with time or respond to diplomatic and humanitarian overtures. It keeps a low profile. It corrupts and weakens governments, not to mention international commerce and finance. It enables terrorists by offering a market for their contraband, laundering and moving their money and operatives and supplying their arms and other war materiel.
It is estimated that this shadowy global network of evil takes in more than $2 trillion a year -- more than double the combined annual military budgets of every nation on earth. This is our true enemy. Yet the United States has not made it any kind of priority in our national defense.
And not one of the raucous political noisemakers currently using every nonsensical hook to imagine linkages to terrorism to grab the headlines has a word to say about it.
The real speech the governor should be giving would put them all in their places.

















Not bad
When I run for office, will you write my speeches for me?