propecia | kamagra | levitra | viagra | cialis | propecia | zantac | viagra | kamagra | cialis | zithromax | nexium | kamagra | cialis | propecia | viagra | levitra | cialis | viagra | cialis | levitra | accutane | clomid | viagra | cialis | the ebook | viagra | kamagra | levitra | cialis | levitra | viagra | kamagra | clomid | propecia | cialis | zithromax | cialis | viagra | diflucan | cialis | viagra | kamagra | levitra | viagra | kamagra | cialis | levitra | viagra | cialis |
Spitzer: the Enigma Variations | The Daily Gotham

Spitzer: the Enigma Variations

I've been saying for a while now that New York Democrats simply don't get Eliot Spitzer.

Another blogger tells me privately that Spitzer's insufficiently pure to be a true reformer (blah! blah! blah!); the single-issue people bemoan or applaud his position on their one issue; the voting machine people say Spitzer doesn't matter because the vote will be stolen (a refreshingly disparaging diary on that particular species of argument is here); some people write jaw-droppingly obtuse stuff about Eliot 'spitting' on things; you get the picture.

The political discourses in this state and this city are, it seems safe to say, as far away from actual relevance as it is possible to be without being a supermarket insert. I wonder sometimes how this can be, given that we New Yorkers are easily the most disputatious lot on the entire continent; you'd think that the self-proclaimed center of the known universe could come up with better campaign-sinkers than Page 10 or that Photoshop nonsense that got people all upset about Virginia Fields last year. In terms of our political conversation, we are basically hacks, unable either to see dark challenges – like that Yassky nonsense – or great opportunities. This because, I'd argue, for a very long time, nobody has changed the rules of the game, leaving the vapid cynical hacks to squabble amongst themselves.

My gut instinct is that Spitzer is going to do precisely that. This guy is a game-changer and paradigm-shifter. When he gets elected, if we assume present trends continue, he's going to have the largest mandate and consequently the greatest power of any governor of this state since, perhaps, Rockefeller. I hesitate to say Lehman, since he had the Senate as well for a time, but our friends at the NY-DSCC are on the beach until 2008. Whatever the proper comparison, Spitzer is going to be a very powerful governor, that much is clear. His prior record as Attorney General does not suggest acquiescence to the status quo; it does suggest that the man grasps what power is, and how to use it.

Eliot Spitzer says he is going to change this state from Day One. I see no reason not to take him at his word.

http://dailygotham.com/blog/bouldin/spitzer_the_enigma_variations
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
0
Michael Bouldin's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Daniel Millstone's picture

We Can Support Spitzer Without Having a Crush on Him

As I see it,

1) Spitzer has a good record as AG

2) 12 Years of Pataki as Gov. have not been wonderful.

3) We should support Spitzer; he seems on record and program to be a better candidate than his opponents.

4) Spitzer's a politician. We should not "take him at his word" or expect paradigm-shifts from elected officals.

Not yet rated.
Gatemouth's picture

But

Fine; support Spitzer; he seems inevitable, and is clearly preferable to Faso. Certainly, with my politics, I'm in no position to object to pragmatism, and his Governorship will represent a great improvement. But, the idea that Spitzer represent some sort of new paradigm is just so much nonsense. It's one thing to make peace with the establishment, and easy and almost costless to do so when they're almost climbing all over each other to be on the winner's bandwagon and get whatever crumbs he may have to offer.It is another thing to endorse the crumbs, especially when pragmatism would dictate that you stay out. Spitzer a new paradigm? For that Michael, I have two words: Carl Andrews.

I'll be happy when he is Governor, but I'm not going to delude myself.

Not yet rated.
brigite bardotjnm's picture

brigite bardotjnm

Descriptions of pubs their atmospheresjnm

Not yet rated.
rwallnerny's picture

What I like about Spitzer...

What I like about Elliot Spitzer is that he's made a lot of enemies. A good politician, somebody who excels at his job, makes a lot of enemies, because they are more concerned with doing the right thing than in kissing ass and making friends. This guy took on Dirty Dick Grasso and the corrupt NYSE and took on many other establishment types. He didn't care how much he was liked or disliked. He cared about doing his job. The fact that so many people hate his guts tells me he's been a damn fine attorney general.

You look at guys like Suozzi and Faso and you see ass-kissers, guys who will say and do anything to make friends. They don't want to make enemies, they don't want to piss anybody off. Which is why they wouldn't be nearly as strong in the governor's office as Spitzer will be.

Not yet rated.
mambo italianosqx's picture

mambo italianosqx

Descriptions of pubs their atmospheressqx

Not yet rated.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

User login