DNCC credentialing controversy explodes
So, as previously noted, there's a brewing controversy over the state blogs credentialed to the Democratic Convention in Denver. The blog chosen for New York is Room Eight, Ben Smith's worthy venture.
Now, here's why that's a problem. Markos touches on the essentials here (note how, as usual, Daily Gotham gets overlooked, which makes me simply, occasionally, just want to throw in the towel, but one soldiers on), but the goal of these state blogs has always been to develop a parallel media structure to get out the Progressive message, build the party, raise money, advance candidates, all of those things.
Per Marc Ambinder, other blogs are weighing in as well, with a letter directly to Howard Dean.
More >>>
We write to you today out of concern that the same principles that have strengthened our party are today being ignored in the state blog credentialing process for the Democratic National Convention in Denver this summer. As long-time progressive state bloggers, we have now witnessed many of our well-respected colleagues from crucial states be passed over. In many states, it appears that parochial politics and hurt egos played a role in these decisions. These concerns run counter to our shared goals of using programs like the state blogger pool to
"tear down the walls" in Denver -- and better connect the American people with the events on the ground. The Democratic Party endangers its own long-term viability when it makes fealty a criterion for inclusion. Instead, the Party should act to ensure that it includes its ideological media allies, even if those allies are occasional tactical or strategic critics. We, the undersigned, have been included in the state credentials pool, despite our own history of criticism of local Democratic actors. This speaks well to the character of our own local parties. But while our peers in other states are being excluded, we'd be remiss in staying silent.
We encourage you to review the selection process undertaken and reasons given by state parties for excluding some of America's most respected state level progressive blogs. We believe a fair and thorough review is necessary to ensure success for this promising experiment in shining a light on the Democratic Convention.
As we've written about countless times, here in New York, the relationship between party and blogdom is good, certainly far better than elsewhere. We've worked together too closely for too long for it to be anything else. Nor is this a zero-sum game; there's no reason why a state like ours shouldn't send a larger delegation to Denver than is presently planned.
What is clear, however, is that an exclusion of the netroots blogs from our convention is not tenable.
DNCC

Michael..Michael..Michael
Are you aying that someomne will 'fix' it so that GATEMOUTH and MYSELF will be selected? You have to be fucking kidding. This is truly dissappoinitng MIKE; truly. I would have hoped you all would be happy for us.
No...
...what I'm saying is that we need more people in Denver than the two of you. That's not anything to be disappointed about, because it doesn't even imply that there's anything wrong with either of you.
The simple fact is that both of you write more or less exclusively about New York City. So what about the rest of the state? What about the people from Rochester, Albany, Long Island?
This is about creating a more diverse group, and not shutting out the people who have worked their tails off here and elsewhere.

OKAY MICHAEL..
Okay MB. I understand better now what your beef is. All is forgiven/lol.
Myers has a diary up on DKos
and I commented on both your and TAP's behalf. Since I'm the second comment, I think it'll get read. Good luck.
DAILY GOTHAM & ALBANY PROJECT
Should both be there.















G-dspeed
Like I've said, they sent out a call for one breed of blog, and credentialed another--I'd be a fool to complain, and yet (typical of me, says Ben Smith) I did—(see, http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/the_cream_rises.html)
I don't necessarily think it's wrong for the DNC to have credentialed a different type of blog (making a big deal out of people with audiences beyond your base may well be a winning strategy), but if that was their intent, they should have said so upfront, and then they would have had the fight they're having now long in advance of people buying their airline tickets in reliance upon their actions, rather than afterward.
To me, we're all a band of brothers and sisters---and there is agreement to that proposition in these quarters, after all Liza helped Scott Sala get Urban Elephants up and running. It reminds me about the small town with only one attorney, and he was starving to death; then one day, seemingly to make matters worse, another lawyer opened shop, and soon, lo and behold, there was enough business for both of them. Well, it’s the same with political blogs. And Mike, though I know you say you see TDG as primarily an organizing tool, the care and art in your writing betrays otherwise.
I hope you succeed in your efforts to get seated at the Convention, but whether you do or not, you Liza, Mole, and the Two Dans will all be there in spirit with me and Rockwell (both of whom, if I recall correctly have posted here from time to time)--I mean that.