'Connecticut for Lieberman' party captured by activists

The 'Connecticut for Lieberman' party has been taken over by outside activsts, reports The New Haven Independent.

Lest one think that this is just as meaningless as would be loose talk of the integrity of Senator LieberSchmuck, note that CfL has a guaranteed ballot line in the 2012 elections, because the party prevailed over Democrat Ned Lamont in November.

The occasion was the second organizational meeting of the Connecticut for Lieberman Party, the vehicle created to propel Connecticut's junior senator to a general election win in 2006 after he lost the Democratic primary to anti-war challenger Ned Lamont. Lieberman created the "party" to have a line on the November ballot. Then he forgot about it.

John Orman, a political science professor at Fairfield University and a longtime outspoken Lieberman critic, contacted the Secretary of the State's office to legally join and then take over the abandoned party, which has a guaranteed ballot line in the next Senate election. Orman came to a Milford Howard Johnson hotel Thursday night with a tall agenda to make the party a soapbox for political theater and Lieberman criticism.

Snip. There's more.

Number two on the agenda: A call for a "sore loser law," otherwise known as the "Lieberman Law," preventing Lieberman-style political party-hopping for losers of primaries.

Perhaps it's just as well that the Senator intends to filibuster with republicans against any Democratic efforts to stop the Bush/McCain escalation. Everyone, no matter how psychopathic, needs friends. And Holy Joe seems to be running out of those.

http://dailygotham.com/blog/bouldin/connecticut_for_lieberman_party_captured_by_activists
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
0
Michael Bouldin's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Paul Curtis's picture

He gets a ballot line

"in the next Senate election." I presume that means the next election for Lieberman's seat?

Is there any law saying that he couldn't legally change his name to "Joe Lieberman" to run on the "Connecticut for Lieberman Party" line against the real Joe Lieberman, thus causing serious fucking hijinks to ensue? Didn't the GOP try something like that in the Bronx a couple years ago?

Not yet rated.
mole333's picture

Hmmm...

Maybe we can get Bouldin to move to CT to change his name and run as Joe Leiberman against Joe Lieberman. I bet he'd even consider it at lest for awhile Eye-wink

Not yet rated.
Paul Curtis's picture

Now you're talking

Whaddya say, Bouldin? I bet you could do a pretty good impression.

Not yet rated.
Michael Bouldin's picture

Feh.

And that's all I'm going to add to that.

Not yet rated.
mole333's picture

Spoken...

Spoken like a good Jew! Now we just have to get you saying "Oy vey!" and we're set.

Not yet rated.
Michael Bouldin's picture

Heh.

Like all New Yorkers, I'm an honorary Jew, no? And I say oy vey all the time, not least because there's so much occasion to do so.

Not yet rated.
mole333's picture

I've always said...

The goyim in New York are more Jewish than most Jews anywhere else...

Not yet rated.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

User login