Bomb blast in Times Square

City Room notes a small blast, believed to come from an improvised explosive device, at the recruiting station in Times Square at 3:43 AM this morning.

© The Daily Gotham

(Image: © The Daily Gotham)

New York City police officers and firefighters cordoned off much of Times Square for more than two hours after a small explosion — set off, the authorities said, by an “improvised explosive device” — damaged the front of the Armed Forces Career Center on the traffic island bounded by 43rd and 44th Streets, Seventh Avenue and Broadway at 3:43 a.m., officials said. No one was injured, and after a temporary interruption, subway service was restored.

Most traffic around Times Square was allowed to pass by 6:45 a.m., after vehicles had been diverted for more than two hours. City officials confirmed that police had initially blocked off the area as a precaution to ensure that there was no secondary device or other threat; the officials emphasized that they did not believe anyone was in danger.

Police officers at the scene said the explosion blew a hole through the front door of the recruiting station, which is at the northern end of the structure.

Members of the Joint Terrorism Task Force, the large Police Department and F.B.I. unit that investigates terrorism, were at the scene of the blast, supporting the Police Department’s Bomb Squad, which along with other police detectives likely will take the lead role in investigating the incident, an F.B.I. official said. The official said that in today’s attack, a man in a gray hooded sweatshirt was seen leaving the scene on a bicycle.

What's interesting, obviously, is the blog reaction on the right; it's gleeful.

Hot Air yaps about domestic terrorism and points fingers - at the political opposition.

Now the [protest at military recruiting offices] movement has decided to morph into domestic terrorism. Of course, the people responsible will claim that they bombed the office during the night to keep anyone from being hurt. That’s exactly the same kind of rationalization that people like the Weather Underground and the SLA used at first, anyway — that terrorism was justified by their politics. In fact, a few like William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn still claim that.

Rhymes with Right knows the culprits:

My personal thought is that this probably makes the perps "Code Pink types", since any self-respecting jihadi would have blown himself up during daylight hours to take out as many innocents as possible. The fact you have a coward fleeing the scene on an environmentally-friendly means of transportation when there was no one around makes it appear to be the tactics of the Left -- though still treasonous terrorism.

Balloon Juice keeps it on point:

Some jackass threw an incendiary device through the window of a recruiting station in Times Square, so you all know what that means- another 5 weeks of LIEBERALS HATE AMERIKKA from the chest-thumping, cheeto-munching chickenhawk brigade.

Nothing like a bombing, obviously, to get the crazies in high dudgeon. Because, after all, when you hear "improvised explosive device", the first thing that comes to the mind of any rational person isn't, say, the ongoing bloody fiasco in Baghdad; no, reasonable people think immediately of Code Pink.

Is it really any wonder that nobody takes these people seriously any more?

Bouldin's picture

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Gothanonymous Reader's picture

Good point Michael. But it

Good point Michael.

But it would be even better if you express some outrage about the act itself.

Pete's picture

"But it would be even better

"But it would be even better if you express some outrage about the act itself."

Amongst us normal people (i.e. liberals), outrage at people planting bombs is kindof assumed.

mole333's picture

Agreed

But it never hurts to make it explicit. Bombs are not acceptable tools for expressing dissent even when deliberately planted to avoid hurting anyone. The first amendment (nor, I would think, the second amendment) does not guarantee the right to destroy property with explosives.

brought to you by


Current weather

NY - New York City, Central Park

day-broken
  • Broken clouds
  • Temperature: 73.4 °F
  • Wind: Variable, 3.5 mph
  • Pressure: 30.12 inHg
  • Rel. Humidity: 78%
  • Visibility: 4 miles

Visit Our Sponsors

Premium Advertisers


Upcoming events

Poll

Subscribe to our daily digest

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz


culturekitchen Media

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Random image

Mana-mana pati pitipi

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 578 guests online.

Blogroll

Editors and Contributors

Mole's Progressive Democrat
New Democratic Majority
Alien and Sedition
Dan Jacoby

The Indies

Adirondack Musings
The Albany Project
Angry Brown Butch
Atlantic Yards Report
Blue Spot
Buffalo Pundit
Buffalo Geek
Bike Blog
Brooklyn Rail
The Community Alliance
Danger Democrat
DDDB
DragonFlyEye
EverythingNY
Gowanus Lounge
Hell's Kitchen Online
Joshing Politics
Mamita Mala
Mamapalooza blog
More Gardens
Nassau GOP Watch
New York Games
No Land Grab
NY 13
On NY Turf
Peter King Watch
Politics on the Hudson
Open Orleans
Prometheus6
Room Eight
Steve Gilliard RIP
The Oil Drum
Troy Polloi
Rochester Turning
Simply Left Behind
Time's Up
The Working Families Party Man
Power from Truth by Chris Owens

The little big media

Capitol Confidential
Gotham Gazette
Daily Politics
Wonkster
New York Blade
NYC Bloggers
NYC Indymedia
The Politicker
EmpireZone
Power Plays
Spin Cycle

The big little media

Curbed
Gawker
Gothamist
The Politico
City Limits

Everybody Party! blogs

New Democratic Majority
Stonewall Democrats
Working Families Party's WFPBlog

The Brains

The Brennan Center
Reform NY
The Century Foundation
Center for American Progress
Drum Major Institute's DMIblog
edwize
TortDeform

The Movement

New Democratic Majority
Democracy for NYC
DL21C
Act Now
Capitol D Group
New York Democratic Lawyers Council

The Loyal Opposition

Alarming News
News Copy
Ragged Thots
Suitably Flip
Urban Elephants
Serf City

Fun Stuff

City Rag
Jossip
Overheard in New York

This list is a work in progress. Are there blogs you believe should be included (maybe your own)? Please leaves us a message through our contact page. Or drop us a line at :

editors(at)
dailygotham(dot)com


Progressive Districts

Only in New York

Fossella [is] anything but the independent fighter for constituents that he claims to be in this campaign. He has been a real water-carrier for the Bush administration and the Republican leadership, staunchly backing the war in Iraq while at the same time denying health benefits to National Guard and Reserve members who make up much of the American force there.

The congressman...has been unsympathetic to environmental concerns and has opposed a woman’s right to choose. He does his constituents no favors by his support for privatizing Social Security. He has voted to protect gun makers and sellers. While Mr. Fossella has lately sought funding to deal with health problems related to to the attacks of Sept. 11, he has largely been missing on important local issues. His Democratic colleague, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who represents the Sixth District, has often been left to advocate Staten Island’s many transportation needs, including the North Shore rail.

Mr. Fossella has offered only lame excuses for improperly using his campaign funds for skiing holidays in Vail (including lessons and equipment), as well as vacations in Florida — transgressions first reported by the Daily News. He has received donations from a lobbying firm with ties to Jack Abramoff. Earlier this year, he was fined a reported $60,000 for misusing his taxpayer-funded official mailing privileges.

— NY Times Editorial Board in 2006